Mammen et al v. County of Sacramento et al
Filing
105
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 6/29/2017 ORDERING Expert Disclosure due by 8/8/2017; Supplemental Expert Disclosure due by 8/22/2017; Close of Phase 2 Discovery due by 9/22/2017; Dispositive Motion, Phase 2 by 10/10/2017, Hearing of Dispositive Motions, Phase 2, set for 11/7/2017 at 1:30; Joint Pretrial Statement due by 12/1/2017; Final Pretrial Conference set for 12/8/2017 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez; and Trial set for 1/8/2018 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6 (JAM) before District Judge John A. Mendez. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
John A. Lavra, CSB No.: 114533
Amanda L. McDermott, CSB No.: 253651
3620 American River Drive, Suite 230
Sacramento, CA 95864
Phone: 916-974-8500
Facsimile: 916-974-8510
Attorneys for Defendants
County of Sacramento;
Stephanie Lynch;
Michelle Callejas;
Debra Williams;
Renae Rodocker;
Luis Villa; and
Craig Larkin
LEIGH LAW GROUP
Jay T. Jambeck SBN #226018
Mandy G. Leigh SBN # 225748
870 Market Street, Suite 1157
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone: 415-399-9155
Facsimile: 415-795-3733
13
14
15
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
A.P. (a minor); Robin Mammen
and Larry Mammen individually
and as Guardian Ad Litem
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
A.P. (a minor); ROBIN MAMMEN and
LARRY MAMMEN individually and as
Guardian ad Litem for A.P.,
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
vs.
)
)
COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING,
)
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, STEPHANIE )
LYNCH, LUIS VILLA; MICHELLE
)
CALLEJAS, DEBRA WILLIAMS, CRAIG )
LARKIN, RENAE RODOCKER,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No.: 2:13-cv-01588-JAM-AC
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
MODIFY THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING
ORDER
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
Page 1
COMES NOW THE PARTIES by and through their respective attorneys and subject to
1
2
the approval of this Court, hereby stipulate and respectfully request the following modifications
3
and/or amendments to this Court’s Pretrial Scheduling Orders dated September 21, 2016 [ECF
4
No. 74] and May 8, 2017 [ECF No. 103]:
Current Schedule
5
Proposed New Schedule
6
Expert Disclosure:
July 8, 2017
Aug. 8, 2017
7
Supplemental Expert Disclosure:
July 29, 2017
Aug. 22, 2017
8
Close of Phase 2 Discovery:
Sept. 1, 2017
Sept. 22, 2017
9
WHEREAS, the parties request no modification or amendment to the following pretrial
10
11
and trial dates [See ECF Nos. 74 and 103]:
Current Schedule
12
13
Filing of Dispositive Motion, Phase 2:
14
Hearing of Dispositive Motions, Phase 2:
15
Joint Pretrial Statement:
16
Final Pretrial Conference:
17
Trial:
Oct. 10, 2017
Nov. 7, 2017, at 1:30p
Dec. 1, 2017
Dec. 8, 2017, at 11:00a
Jan. 8, 2018, at 9:00a
18
WHEREAS, counsel for all parties have met and discussed the posture of this case, and
19
20
agree that it would be in the interests of justice and judicial economy and that good causes exists
21
for the modification of the scheduling order;
WHEREAS, the parties continue to engage in settlement discussions and need additional
22
23
time to determine whether resolution of this matter without further litigation is possible at this
24
time;
WHEREAS, this request is not being made for the purpose of delay, or any other
25
26
improper purpose; and
27
///
28
///
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
Page 2
1
2
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED and agreed by and between the parties
that this Court modifies the pretrial deadlines as set forth above.
3
4
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
5
6
Dated: June 29, 2017
7
LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP
By: /s/ Amanda L. McDermott
JOHN A. LAVRA
AMANDA L. MCDERMOTT
8
9
10
Dated: June 29, 2017
11
LEIGH LAW GROUP
/s/ Jay T. Jambeck
By: JAY T. JAMBECK
MANDY G. LEIGH
12
13
14
15
IT IS SO ORDERED.
16
17
18
Dated: _6/29/2017
/s/ John A. Mendez
JOHN A. MENDEZ
United States District Court Judge
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO MODIFY THE PRETRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER
Page 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?