Mammen et al v. County of Sacramento et al

Filing 33

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 2/5/14 GRANTING joint stipulation. Plaintiffs shall file a second amended complaint by 3/14/14. 27 and 28 Motions to Dismiss are withdrawn. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Jay Jambeck SBN #226018 Mandy G. Leigh SBN # 225748 Sarah J. Fairchild SBN #238469 LEIGH LAW GROUP 870 Market Street, Suite 1157 San Francisco, CA 94102 Telephone: 415-399-9155 Facsimile: 415-795-3733 Email: mleigh@leighlawgroup.com Attorneys for R.Mammen, L. Mammen and A.P. 7 8 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ROBIN MAMMEN, LARRY MAMMEN 11 Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for A.P. 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; ANNE EDWARDS; MICHELLE CALLEJAS; LUIS VILLA; STEPHANIE LYNCH; DEBBIE WILIAMS; CRAIG LARKEN; RENAE RODOCKER;MIRI MEE; JACK DANIEL; JEANINE LOPEZ; REY CARBONI; COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING; MICHELLE WONG; GEOFF WELLS; BRENDA CHANEY; CHILDRENS LAW CENTER; DANA PETERS; AND DOES 1 through 20, Inclusive Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:13-CV-01588-JAM-AC JOINT STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFENDANTS TO WITHDRAW CURRENT MOTIONS TO DISMISS Plaintiffs ROBIN MAMMEN, LARRY MAMMEN AND A.P. ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES: ANN EDWARDS: MICHELLE CALLEJAS; LUIS VILLA; STEPHANIE LYNCH; DEBRA WILLIAMS; CRAIG LARKIN; RENAE RODOCKER; MIRI MEE; JEANNINE LOPEZ; REY CARBONI; COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING; MICHELLE WONG; GEOFF 28 JOINT STIPULATION FOR AMENDMENT OF COMPLAINT AND WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION TO DISMISS 2:13-CV-01588-JAM-AC 1 WELLS; BRENDA CHANEY; CHILDRENS LAW CENTER; DANA PETERS AND DOES 1- 2 100, INCLUSIVE. ("Defendants") (hereafter collectively referred to as "the Parties") submit this 3 stipulation to request a continuance in this matter as follows: 4 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a complaint against all Defendants on August 1, 2013 [Docket1]; 5 WHEREAS, County Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on October 22, 2013 [Docket 14]; 6 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint against all Defendants on November 7 18, 2013 [Docket 16]; 8 WHEREAS; State Defendants filed for an extension of time on December 6, 2013 [Docket 25]; 9 WHEREAS, the Court signed an Order granting County Defendant’s request for an extension 10 of time. [Docket 24]; 11 WHEREAS, County Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on December 23, 2013 [Docket 27]; 12 WHEREAS, State Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss on January 9, 2014 [Docket 28]; 13 WHEREAS, Plaintiffs secured new counsel and submitted a substitution of attorney notice on 14 or about February 1, 2014; 15 WHEREAS, the Parties conferred by phone February 3, 2014 and agreed to stipulate to a 16 continuance to permit Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint without waiving Defendants’ 17 right to file a motion to dismiss or to file a response; 18 The Parties stipulate as follows: 19 1. Plaintiff will be permitted to file an amended complaint (“Second Amended Complaint) by 20 21 March 14, 2014; 2. Without waiving their right to file responsive pleadings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 12 22 or to Answer the Complaint, the Defendants will withdraw their presently filed Motions to 23 Dismiss; 24 3. The Parties will file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement 60 days after the date 25 of the filing of the amended complaint and shall confer regarding this Conference 26 Statement pursuant to Judge Mendez’s Order regarding filing requirements. 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION FOR AMENDMENT OF COMPLAINT AND WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION TO DISMISS 2:13-CV-01588-JAM-AC 1 2 3 4 THE PARTIES SO STIPULATE. 5 6 Dated this 4th day of February, 2014. 7 Respectfully submitted, LEIGH LAW GROUP 8 By:____/s Mandy G. Leigh____ Mandy G. Leigh Attorneys for Plaintiffs 9 10 11 12 Dated this 4th day of February, 2014. Respectfully submitted, 13 CALIFORNIA DEPT OF JUSTICE 14 15 By:____/s Renuka R. George 16 Renuka R. George Attorneys for Community Care Licensing; Michelle Wong, Leon “Geoff” Wells and Brenda Chaney (“State Defendants”) 17 18 19 20 Dated this 4th day of February, 2014. Respectfully submitted, 21 LONGYEAR, O’DEA & LAVRA, LLP 22 23 By: /s Amanda L. McDermott Amanda L. McDermott Attorneys for County of Sacramento and the individually named County Defendants 24 25 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION FOR AMENDMENT OF COMPLAINT AND WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION TO DISMISS 2:13-CV-01588-JAM-AC 1 2 3 4 BEFORE THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6 ROBIN MAMMEN, LARRY MAMMEN 7 Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem for A.P. 8 Plaintiffs, 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 v. COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES; ANNE EDWARDS; MICHELLE CALLEJAS; LUIS VILLA; STEPHANIE LYNCH; DEBBIE WILIAMS; CRAIG LARKEN; RENAE RODOCKER;MIRI MEE; JACK DANIEL; JEANINE LOPEZ; REY CARBONI; COMMUNITY CARE LICENSING; MICHELLE WONG; GEOFF WELLS; BRENDA CHANEY; CHILDRENS LAW CENTER; DANA PETERS; AND DOES 1 through 20, Inclusive Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 2:13-CV-01588-JAM-AC ORDER GRANTING JOINT STIPULATION FOR CONTINUANCE TO ALLOW PLAINTIFF TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT AND DEFNDANTS TO WITHDRAW CURRENT MOTIONS TO DISMISS 19 20 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED that the above-entitled Joint Stipulation is GRANTED. PLAINTIFFS shall file a Second Amended Complaint by March 14, 2014. Additionally, the Parties shall file a Joint Case Management Conference Statement 60 days from the date of the filing of Plaintiffs Joint Case Management Conference Statement. 23 24 Date: 2/5/2014 25 /s/ John A. Mendez_________________ Honorable Judge John A. Mendez Judge of the United States District Court 26 27 28 JOINT STIPULATION FOR AMENDMENT OF COMPLAINT AND WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION TO DISMISS 2:13-CV-01588-JAM-AC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?