Ortiz v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.

Filing 13

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/23/13 as to 6 MOTION to DISMISS : Motion Hearing reset for 2/27/2014 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Shaun Setareh (SBN 204514) shaun@setarehlaw.com Adrienne Herrera (SBN 278640) adrienne@setarehlaw.com SETAREH LAW GROUP 9454 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 711 Beverly Hills, California 90212 Telephone: (310) 888-7771 Facsimile: (310) 888-0109 7 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff, MARIBEL ORTIZ 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 14 15 MARIBEL ORTIZ, on behalf of herself, all others similarly situated, and the general public, 16 Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 21 22 vs. HOBBY LOBBY STORES, INC., an Oklahoma corporation; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Case No. 2:13-cv-01619-TLN-DAD ORDER RE: JOINT STIPULATION TO CONTINUE HEARING FOR DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS FROM JANUARY 16, 2013 TO FEBRUARY 27, 2013 Action Filed: August 2, 2013 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 __________________________________ PROPOSED ORDER 1 ORDER 2 3 4 TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: 5 Having considered the Stipulation between counsel for plaintiff Maribel Ortiz 6 (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. (“Defendants”) to grant Plaintiff a 7 continuance in the foregoing hearing, and good cause appearing therefore, this Court 8 hereby ORDERS: Plaintiff’s request to continue the foregoing hearing to February 27, 9 2013 or next available Law and Motion calendar date is GRANTED. 10 Future requests for a continuance by either party based on a scheduling conflict 11 shall specify any and all facts detailing said conflict before this Court grants a 12 continuance based on a scheduling conflict. 13 IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 16 Dated: December 23, 2013 17 18 19 20 21 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 __________________________________

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?