Spencer v. Virga et al

Filing 33

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/2/15 ORDERING that plaintiffs motion to extend his time to file objections (ECF No. 32 ) is granted, and he shall have until April 10, 2015, to file objections to the January 26, 2015 findings and recommendations. Defendants reply, if any, shall be filed within seven days thereafter.(Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 THURMAN LERON SPENCER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-01626 WBS AC P v. ORDER TIMOTHY VIRGA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 17 18 action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a letter advising that he did not 19 receive the court’s February 24, 2015 order granting his motion to extend his time to file 20 objections (ECF No. 30) until March 10, 2015. ECF No. 32. As a result, he states that he is 21 calculating his deadline to file objections to the January 26, 2015 findings and recommendations 22 (ECF No. 27) as April 10, 2015, thirty days from the date he received the order. Id. The court extended plaintiff’s deadline to file objections to thirty days from the date of the 23 24 order, not thirty days from the date plaintiff received the order. ECF No. 30. However, 25 plaintiff’s letter will be construed as a motion for extension, which the court will grant. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion to extend his time to file 26 27 objections (ECF No. 32) is granted, and he shall have until April 10, 2015, to file objections to 28 //// 1 1 the January 26, 2015 findings and recommendations. Defendants’ reply, if any, shall be filed 2 within seven days thereafter. 3 DATED: April 2, 2015 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?