Hicks v. Hamkar et al
Filing
119
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 9/27/17 ORDERING that the FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS filed 7/26/17 104 are ADOPTED in full; and Plaintiff's 10/14/16 MOTION for an Injunction 93 is DENIED without prejudice. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
MICHAEL J. HICKS,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:13-cv-1687 KJM DB P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
BEHROZ HAMKAR, et al.,
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
18
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided
19
by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
20
On July 26, 2017, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were
21
served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings
22
and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to
23
the findings and recommendations. In fact, in a document filed here on September 1, 2017,
24
plaintiff informed the court that he feels the undersigned should adopt the findings and
25
recommendations in full. (ECF No. 115.)
26
The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602
27
F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo.
28
See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed
1
1
the file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by
2
the proper analysis.
3
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
4
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 26, 2017 (ECF No. 104) are adopted in
5
6
full; and
2. Plaintiff’s October 14, 2016 motion for an injunction (ECF No. 93) is denied without
7
prejudice.
8
DATED: September 27, 2017.
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?