Hicks v. Hamkar et al

Filing 15

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/24/2014 GRANTING plaintiff's 14 motion to dismiss defendant Zamora; and defendant Zamora is DISMISSED from this action. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL HICKS,

12
13
14

No. 2:13-cv-1687 DAD P

Plaintiff,
v.

ORDER

BEHROZ HAMKAR et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has requested to dismiss defendant Zamora

18

from this action. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), the court will honor

19

plaintiff’s request.

20

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

21

1. Plaintiff’s motion to dismiss defendant Zamora (Doc. No. 14) is granted; and

22

2. Defendant Zamora is dismissed from this action.

23

Dated: September 24, 2014

24
25
26

DAD:9
hick1687.59

27
28
1