Hicks v. Hamkar et al

Filing 66

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/6/16 ORDERING that Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time (Doc. No. 64 ) is granted in part; and plaintiff is granted 45 days from the date of this order in which to file objections to the courts December 3, 2015, findings and recommendations, and to oppose defendants motion to dismiss filed on December 10, 2015.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MICHAEL HICKS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

No. 2:13-cv-1687 KJM CKD P (TEMP)

v.

ORDER

BEHROZ HAMKAR et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
Plaintiff has filed a motion for a ninety-day extension of time to file objections to the

17
18

court’s December 3, 2015, findings and recommendations, and to oppose defendants’ motion to

19

dismiss filed on December 10, 2015. Good cause appearing, the court will grant plaintiff’s

20

motion in part and allow him forty-five days to file any objections to the findings and

21

recommendations and to oppose defendants’ motion to dismiss.

22

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

23

1. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (Doc. No. 64) is granted in part; and

24

2. Plaintiff is granted forty-five days from the date of this order in which to file objections

25

/////

26

/////

27

/////

28

/////

1

to the court’s December 3, 2015, findings and recommendations, and to oppose defendants’

2

motion to dismiss filed on December 10, 2015.

3

Dated: January 6, 2016

_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

4
5
6
7

ec/md
hick1687.36obj

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2