Powers et al v. Unknown

Filing 6

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/28/13 ORDERING that No later than 9/11/2013, plaintiffs shall specifically identify the entities or internet service providers on whom they seek to serve Rule 45 subpoenas. Plaintiffs shall further identify the specific internet pseudonyms of the Doe defendants. Plaintiffs' ex parte application shall thereafter stand submitted.(Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JARED POWERS, et al., 12 No. 2:13-cv-1701 JAM CKD Plaintiffs, 13 v. 14 DOES 1-50, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 In this action, plaintiffs allege claims for copyright infringement, defamation, and related 17 18 state law claims arising out of allegedly defamatory statements published on the internet. 19 Plaintiffs have filed an ex parte application seeking leave to conduct discovery prior to the Rule 20 26(f) conference so as to obtain information regarding the identity of the Doe defendants. Further 21 clarification of the relief sought is required. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. No later than September 11, 2013, plaintiffs shall specifically identify the entities 24 or internet service providers on whom they seek to serve Rule 45 subpoenas. Plaintiffs shall 25 further identify the specific internet pseudonyms of the Doe defendants. 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 2 2. Plaintiffs’ ex parte application shall thereafter stand submitted. Dated: August 28, 2013 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3 4 5 6 4 powers1701.exh 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?