Jamison v. Gummi et al

Filing 42

ORDER and AMENDED DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 04/22/14 vacating 35 defendant's motion to dismiss. Defendant may, within 14 days, bring a motion for summary judgment pursuant to FRCP 56 on the i ssue of administrative exhaustion. In doing so, defendant must provide plaintiff with the notice required under Rand v. Rowland. The discovery deadline is extended to 12/14/14. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or before 04/01/15. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEREMY JAMISON, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:13-cv-01705-AC-P Plaintiff, v. SAMBRAJYA PALAGUMMI, ORDER AND AMENDED DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S. § 1983. 18 Pending before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to exhaust 19 administrative remedies pursuant to non-enumerated Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b). ECF No. 35. Plaintiff 20 has opposed the motion. ECF Nos. 40-41. 21 On April 3, 2014, the Ninth Circuit overruled Wyatt v. Terhune, 315 F.3d 1108, 1119 (9th 22 Cir. 2003), and held that the defense of failure to exhaust administrative remedies under 42 23 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) should in most cases be presented in a motion for summary judgment rather 24 than a motion to dismiss under unenumerated Rule 12(b). Albino v. Baca, No. 10-55702, 2014 25 WL 1317141 (9th Cir. Apr. 3, 2014) (en banc). Because defendant has moved for dismissal of 26 the complaint as administratively unexhausted pursuant to Rule 12(b), and has not complied with 27 the requirements of Rule 56, the court will vacate the motion and direct the defendant to file 28 within fourteen (14) days a motion that complies with Albino. 1 1 Also pending before the court is defendant’s motion to modify the discovery and 2 scheduling order of February 14, 2014. ECF No. 39. In the motion, defendant requests a six 3 month extension of the discovery and dispositive motions deadline governing this case in order 4 “to complete discovery and obtain the necessary information to prepare her defense.” Id. at 2. 5 Based on defendant’s good faith efforts to meet the deadlines in the discovery schedule entered in 6 this case to date and for good cause shown, the court will grant the motion. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 7 16(b)(4). 8 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: 9 1. Defendant’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 35) is vacated; 10 2. Defendant may, within fourteen days, bring a motion for summary judgment pursuant 11 to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 on the issue of administrative exhaustion. In doing so, defendant must 12 provide plaintiff with the notice required under Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir. 13 1998) (en banc); 14 3. The discovery deadline is extended to December 14, 2014. Any motions necessary to 15 compel discovery shall be filed by that date. All requests for discovery pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. 16 P. 31, 33, 34 or 36 shall be served not later than sixty days prior to that date (October 15, 2014); 17 18 19 4. All pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or before April 1, 2015; and, 5. All other provisions of this Court’s February 14, 2014 Discovery and Scheduling Order 20 remain in effect. 21 DATED: April 22, 2014 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?