Federal Deposit Insurance Company v. Ching et al
Filing
93
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/20/2015 DENYING Defendents Motions to Compel 87 , 88 without prejudice and the 8/26/2015 hearing thereon is VACATED. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE
CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR
BUTTE COMMUNITY BANK,
13
Plaintiffs,
14
15
16
17
18
No. 2:13-cv-1710-KJM-EFB
ORDER
v.
ROBERT CHING, EUGENE EVEN,
DONALD LEFORCE, ELLIS
MATTHEWS, LUTHER McLAUGHLIN,
ROBERT MORGAN, JAMES
RICKARDS, GARY STRAUSS, HUBERT
TOWNSHEND, JOHN COGER AND
KEITH ROBBINS,
19
Defendants.
20
On August 5, 2015, defendants Donald Leforce and Robert Ching moved to compel
21
22
plaintiff to respond to their discovery requests. ECF Nos. 87, 88. The motions were noticed for
23
hearing on August 26, 2015. Id. Local Rule 251(a) provides that the Joint Statement Re
24
Discovery Disagreement must be filed at least seven days before the scheduled hearing date.
25
E.D. Cal. L.R. 251(a). Local Rule 251(a) also provides that the hearing on a discovery motion
26
may be dropped from calendar without prejudice if the Joint Statement re Discovery
27
Disagreement is not timely filed. Id.
28
/////
1
1
Although the deadline has passed, the docket reveals that no Joint Statement re Discovery
2
Disagreement has been filed in connection with defendants motions to compel. Therefore, those
3
motions (ECF Nos. 87, 88) are denied without prejudice and the August 26, 2015 hearing thereon
4
is vacated.
5
6
SO ORDERED.
DATED: August 20, 2015.
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?