Federal Deposit Insurance Company v. Ching et al

Filing 93

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/20/2015 DENYING Defendents Motions to Compel 87 , 88 without prejudice and the 8/26/2015 hearing thereon is VACATED. (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION AS RECEIVER FOR BUTTE COMMUNITY BANK, 13 Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 17 18 No. 2:13-cv-1710-KJM-EFB ORDER v. ROBERT CHING, EUGENE EVEN, DONALD LEFORCE, ELLIS MATTHEWS, LUTHER McLAUGHLIN, ROBERT MORGAN, JAMES RICKARDS, GARY STRAUSS, HUBERT TOWNSHEND, JOHN COGER AND KEITH ROBBINS, 19 Defendants. 20 On August 5, 2015, defendants Donald Leforce and Robert Ching moved to compel 21 22 plaintiff to respond to their discovery requests. ECF Nos. 87, 88. The motions were noticed for 23 hearing on August 26, 2015. Id. Local Rule 251(a) provides that the Joint Statement Re 24 Discovery Disagreement must be filed at least seven days before the scheduled hearing date. 25 E.D. Cal. L.R. 251(a). Local Rule 251(a) also provides that the hearing on a discovery motion 26 may be dropped from calendar without prejudice if the Joint Statement re Discovery 27 Disagreement is not timely filed. Id. 28 ///// 1 1 Although the deadline has passed, the docket reveals that no Joint Statement re Discovery 2 Disagreement has been filed in connection with defendants motions to compel. Therefore, those 3 motions (ECF Nos. 87, 88) are denied without prejudice and the August 26, 2015 hearing thereon 4 is vacated. 5 6 SO ORDERED. DATED: August 20, 2015. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?