Singh v. Mayorkas

Filing 10

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 10/18/13 ORDERING the government's new answer date will be February 21, 2014, and the parties will file the joint status report at that time as well. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
5 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (915) 554-2700 Email: Audrey.Hemesath@usdoj.gov 6 Attorneys for Defendants 1 2 3 4 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 MEHAL SINGH, 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 13 14 v. ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Defendant. 15 ) ) Case No.: 2:13-cv-1716 JAM DAD ) ) Joint Stipulation and Order re: Abeyance ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 16 17 18 19 This is an immigration case in which Plaintiff challenged an alleged delay in the adjudication of his I-485 application to adjust status and his I-730 relative petitions. The applications have now been approved and are in the process of being sent to the United States 20 21 Citizenship and Immigration office in New Delhi, India, where the agency will adjudicate the 22 travel authorization documents. Accordingly, the parties agree to a 4-month abeyance period 23 toward the end of allowing USCIS to transmit the approved petitions to New Delhi and awaiting 24 a possible administrative resolution to the matter. 25 The government’s new answer date will be February 21, 2014, and the parties will file 26 27 the joint status report at that time as well. 28 1 1 Dated: October 18, 2013 Respectfully submitted, BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 2 3 /s/ Audrey B. Hemesath AUDREY B. HEMESATH Assistant U.S. Attorney 4 5 6 7 8 DATED: October 11, 2013 9 10 Respectfully submitted, /s/ Jonathan Kaufman Jonathan Kaufman Attorney for the Plaintiff 11 12 13 14 ORDER 15 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 18 19 20 21 DATED: 10/18/2013 /s/ John A. Mendez________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?