Hass v. County of Sacramento, et al.

Filing 7

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/23/2013 REFERRING this matter and the 4 Motion to Dismiss to Judge John A. Mendez pursuant to L.R. 302(c)(21); VACATING all pending dates; ORDERING the moving Defendant to promptly re-notice the pending Motion to Dismiss for hearing before the assigned district judge; ORDERING that the capion on all documents filed henceforth be No.: 2:13-cv-1746 JAM KJN. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES D. HASS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 15 No. 2:13-cv-1746-JAM-KJN v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO DEPARTMENT OF SUPPORT SERVICES, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 On August 22, 2013, this action was removed to this court from the Sacramento County 18 19 Superior Court. (ECF No. 1.) Because it appeared from the papers attached to the notice of 20 removal that plaintiff James D. Hass was proceeding without counsel, the action was referred to 21 the undersigned pursuant to E.D. Cal. L.R. 302(c)(21). Thereafter, on August 29, 2013, defendants County of Sacramento Department of Support 22 23 Services and Scott Jones filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24 12(b)(6), which was noticed for hearing before the undersigned on October 3, 2013. (ECF No. 4.) 25 On September 19, 2013, plaintiff’s attorney, Loretta Hazel Hellen, filed an opposition to the 26 motion on plaintiff’s behalf, indicating that she was acting as the attorney for plaintiff. (ECF 27 Nos. 5, 6.) Ms. Helen was accordingly added to the docket as counsel of record. 28 //// 1 1 Local Rule 302(c)(21) provides that magistrate judges shall conduct all appropriate pre- 2 trial proceedings in “actions in which all the plaintiffs or defendants are proceeding in propria 3 persona, including dispositive and non-dispositive motions and matters. Actions initially 4 assigned to a Magistrate Judge under this paragraph shall be referred back to the assigned Judge if 5 a party appearing in propria persona is later represented by an attorney in accordance with L.R. 6 180.” E.D. Cal. L.R. 302(c)(21). 7 In light of the appearance of counsel on plaintiff’s behalf, neither all the plaintiffs nor all 8 the defendants in this action are proceeding in propria persona. Therefore, further proceedings in 9 this action, other than discovery motions and other matters appropriately referred to the 10 undersigned under the court’s Local Rules, should now be noticed before the United States 11 District Judge assigned to this action. 12 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 13 1. This matter, including the pending motion to dismiss (ECF No. 4) is referred to the 14 United States District Judge assigned to this action. See E.D. Cal. L.R. 302(c)(21). 15 2. All dates pending before the undersigned are VACATED. The moving defendants 16 shall promptly re-notice the pending motion to dismiss for hearing before the assigned 17 district judge. 18 19 20 21 3. Henceforth the caption on documents filed in this action shall be No. 2:13-cv-1746 JAM KJN. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 23, 2013 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?