Watts v. Ruggiero et al

Filing 31

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 12/23/2014 AFFIRMING the 11/21/2014 28 Order denying plaintiff's Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Marciel, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TIMOTHY WATTS, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:13-cv-1749 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. RUGGIERO, et al., Defendants. 16 17 On December 4, 2014, Plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate 18 judge’s order filed November 21, 2014, denying Plaintiff’s motions for appointment of counsel. 19 Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly 20 erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the Court finds that the 21 magistrate judge’s ruling was not clearly erroneous or contrary to law. 22 23 Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed November 21, 2014, is affirmed. 24 25 Dated: December 23, 2014 26 27 28 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?