Watts v. Ruggiero et al

Filing 48

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/20/2016 ORDERING, within 21 days, the parties shall file and serve separate statements that inform the court of the following: 1) Whether court mediation may be helpful in resolving this action, and therefore whether each party requests that a settlement conference be scheduled; 2) If the answer to the prior question is in the affirmative, whether each party waives the disqualification of the undersigned magistrate judge to conduct such s ettlement conference, or requests that another magistrate judge be assigned for that purpose; 3) The anticipated length of jury trial in this action; 4) Any dates through April 2017 when any party may not be available to participate in a settlement conference and/or to appear for pretrial and trial proceedings. (Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TIMOTHY WATTS, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-1749 TLN AC P v. ORDER M. RUGGIERO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 On April 5, 2016, this court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment on all 17 18 grounds with the exception that this case now proceeds only on plaintiff’s First Amendment 19 retaliation claim against defendant M. Ruggiero. See ECF Nos. 43, 47. Before setting further 20 deadlines in this action, the court will assess the parties’ willingness to participate in a settlement 21 conference and their availability to participate in such conference and/or with further pretrial and 22 trial proceedings. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within twenty-one (21) days after service 23 24 of this order, the parties shall file and serve separate statements that inform the court of the 25 following: 1. Whether court mediation may be helpful in resolving this action, and therefore whether 26 27 each party requests that a settlement conference be scheduled. 28 //// 1 2. If the answer to the prior question is in the affirmative, whether each party waives the 2 disqualification of the undersigned magistrate judge to conduct such settlement conference, or 3 requests that another magistrate judge be assigned for that purpose. 4 3. The anticipated length of jury trial in this action. 5 4. Any dates through April 2017 when any party may not be available to participate in a 6 settlement conference and/or to appear for pretrial and trial proceedings. 7 SO ORDERED. 8 DATED: April 20, 2016 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?