Farley v. Virga et al

Filing 121

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/10/15 recommending that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM D. FARLEY, 12 No. 2:13-cv-1751 WBS KJN P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 T. VIRGA, et al., 15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Defendants. 16 A suggestion of death upon the record pertaining to the death of plaintiff was filed on 17 18 August 6, 2015. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25, a motion for substitution of a 19 proper party must be made no later than ninety days after the death is suggested upon the record. 20 That time period has now expired, and no motion for substitution has been filed. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed. 22 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 23 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 24 after service of these findings and recommendations, any written objections may be filed with the 25 court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and 26 Recommendations.” Any response to the objections shall be filed and served within fourteen 27 //// 28 //// 1 1 days after service of the objections. Failure to file objections within the specified time may waive 2 the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). 3 Dated: November 10, 2015 4 5 6 7 farl1751.death.fr 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?