Farley v. Virga et al

Filing 86

ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 1/20/2015 DENYING 85 Motion for Reconsideration. (Michel, G)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9

WILLIAM D. FARLEY,

10

No. 2: 13-cv-1751 WBS KJN P

Plaintiff,

11

v.

12

T. VIRGA, et al.,

13

ORDER

Defendants.

14
15

On November 13, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued an order denying plaintiff’s motion

16

for law library access and for a 180 days extension of time to file his opposition to defendants’

17

motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 83.) Pursuant to the mailbox rule, on December 8, 2014, plaintiff

18

filed a request for reconsideration of that order.

19

Local Rule 303(b), states “rulings by Magistrate Judges . . . shall be final if no

20

reconsideration thereof is sought from the Court within fourteen days . . . from the date of service

21

of the ruling on the parties.” Id. Plaintiff’s request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s

22

order of November 13, 2014, is therefore untimely.

23

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s December 24, 2014 request for

24

reconsideration (ECF No. 85) is denied.

25

Dated: January 20, 2015

26
27
28

Far1751.851
1