Farley v. Virga et al
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/13/13 ORDERING that Plaintiffs motion for the appointment of counsel 8 is denied without prejudice; Plaintiffs motion for an extension of time 8 is granted; and Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file a complaint and to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis.(Dillon, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WILLIAM D. FARLEY,
12
No. 2:13-cv-1751 KJN P
Plaintiff,
13
v.
14
T. VIRGA, et al.,
15
ORDER
Defendants.
16
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
18
Plaintiff requests that the court appoint counsel. District courts lack authority to require counsel
19
to represent indigent prisoners in section 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490
20
U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In exceptional circumstances, the court may request an attorney to
21
voluntarily to represent such a plaintiff. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d
22
1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990).
23
When determining whether “exceptional circumstances” exist, the court must consider plaintiff’s
24
likelihood of success on the merits as well as the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro
25
se in light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970
26
(9th Cir. 2009) (district court did not abuse discretion in declining to appoint counsel). The
27
burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances is on the plaintiff. Id. Circumstances
28
common to most prisoners, such as lack of legal education and limited law library access, do not
1
2
establish exceptional circumstances that warrant a request for voluntary assistance of counsel.
Having considered the factors under Palmer, the court finds that plaintiff has failed to
3
meet his burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances warranting the appointment of
4
counsel at this time.
5
6
Plaintiff has also filed a motion for extension of time to file a complaint and to submit an
application to proceed in forma pauperis. Good cause appearing, this request is granted.
7
Plaintiff also alleges that his legal property is being withheld and requests that the court
8
order prison officials to return it to plaintiff. Plaintiff does not discuss why his legal property is
9
being withheld or what attempts he has made to have it returned. Plaintiff also does not identify
10
any prison official who has denied his request for the return of his legal property. Accordingly,
11
plaintiff’s request for the court to order prison officials to return his legal property is denied
12
without prejudice. A renewed request for the court to order prison officials to return plaintiff’s
13
legal property must be well supported.
14
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
15
1. Plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel (ECF No. 8) is denied without
16
prejudice;
17
2. Plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time (ECF No. 8) is granted; and
18
3. Plaintiff is granted thirty days from the date of this order in which to file a complaint
19
and to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis.
20
Dated: November 13, 2013
21
22
farl1751.31kjn+36
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?