Starbucks Corporation v. Amcor Packaging Distribution, et al.,

Filing 71

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/29/15 ORDERING that the Motion to Compel 64 is GRANTED. Defendant shall provide further responses to the interrrogatories, without objections, no later than 8/12/15. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 STARBUCKS CORPORATION, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:13-1754 WBS CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER AMCOR PACKAGING DISTRIBUTION, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 Third party defendant Ozburn-Hessey Logistics’ motion to compel came on regularly for 19 hearing on July 29, 2015. David Klein appeared for the third party defendant. Thomas Moses 20 appeared for defendant and third party plaintiff Pallets Unlimited, LLC. Manish Parikh appeared 21 for defendant Amcor Packaging. No appearance was made for plaintiff. Upon review of the 22 documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause 23 appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: 24 The motion to compel (ECF No. 64) is granted. Defendant shall provide further responses 25 to the interrogatories, without objections, no later than August 12, 2015. 26 Dated: July 29, 2015 27 28 4 starbucks1754.oah _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?