Smith v. Shariat et al
Filing
37
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/25/2014 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 34 are ADOPTED in FULL; Frontier Adjusters' 21 motion to dismiss is GRANTED; Hilts and Evergreen's 22 motion to dismiss is GRANTED; Shariat's 23 motion to dismiss is GRANTED; and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
WAYNE D. SMITH,
12
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-1830 TLN AC PS
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
AZIZ SHARIAT, ET AL.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
18
19
Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro per and in forma pauperis. The matter was
referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21).
On June 17, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which
20
were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the
21
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed
22
objections to the findings and recommendations.
23
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this
24
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
25
Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
26
analysis.
27
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
28
1. The June 17, 2014 findings and recommendations (ECF No. 34) are adopted in full;
1
1
2. Frontier Adjusters’ May 12, 2014 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 21) is granted;
2
3. Hilts and Evergreen’s May 12, 2014 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 22) is granted;
3
4. Shariat’s May 14, 2014 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 23) is granted; and
4
5. This action is dismissed with prejudice.
5
Dated: August 25, 2014
6
7
8
9
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?