Smith v. Shariat et al

Filing 37

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/25/2014 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 34 are ADOPTED in FULL; Frontier Adjusters' 21 motion to dismiss is GRANTED; Hilts and Evergreen's 22 motion to dismiss is GRANTED; Shariat's 23 motion to dismiss is GRANTED; and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WAYNE D. SMITH, 12 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-1830 TLN AC PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER AZIZ SHARIAT, ET AL., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action in pro per and in forma pauperis. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21). On June 17, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which 20 were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the 21 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has filed 22 objections to the findings and recommendations. 23 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 24 Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the 25 Court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper 26 analysis. 27 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 28 1. The June 17, 2014 findings and recommendations (ECF No. 34) are adopted in full; 1 1 2. Frontier Adjusters’ May 12, 2014 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 21) is granted; 2 3. Hilts and Evergreen’s May 12, 2014 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 22) is granted; 3 4. Shariat’s May 14, 2014 motion to dismiss (ECF No. 23) is granted; and 4 5. This action is dismissed with prejudice. 5 Dated: August 25, 2014 6 7 8 9 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?