The Mountain Club Owner's Association v. Graybar Electric Company, Inc.
Filing
61
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/4/15. General Cable is directed to perform cable replacement in accordance with this order; the parties shall meet and confer regarding potential dates and cooperate in good faith; General Cable shall bear the reasonable costs as discussed in detail at the telephonic conference; if the parties wish to modify the pretrial scheduling order they shall submit a joint proposed schedule. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
THE MOUNTAIN CLUB OWNER’S
ASSOCIATION,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
No. 2:13-cv-1835-WBS-KJN
ORDER
v.
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY,
INC.,
Defendant.
17
18
On July 30, 2015, the court, at the parties’ request, conducted an informal discovery
19
teleconference in this matter. Diana Lofti appeared on behalf of plaintiff The Mountain Club
20
Owner’s Association (“Mountain Club”) and Philip Ward appeared on behalf of Third-Party
21
Defendant General Cable Corporation (“General Cable”). For the reasons discussed with the
22
parties at the teleconference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
23
1. General Cable may remove a length of originally-installed electric armored cable
24
located in the void space above two layers of sheetrock in the ceiling of Unit 327
25
which is connected to the suspended light fixture in that unit, and shall then replace
26
the length of cable with an appropriate electric cable in compliance with all applicable
27
codes. General Cable shall bear the costs related to removal of the cable and restoring
28
the property to its original condition subsequent to the removal. The parties shall
1
1
further meet and confer regarding (a) the procedure for selecting the electrician and
2
other appropriate contractors to perform the removal and restoration; (b) any necessary
3
certifications or indemnifications for the work and restoration to be performed; and (c)
4
the protocol for testing any removed cable, including which party(ies) will have
5
custody of the removed cable.
2. General Cable’s requests to cut a hole in, or remove a section of, two layers of
6
7
sheetrock ceiling in Unit 327 and the plywood sheeting in the attic space above Unit
8
327 to permit physical entry and visual inspection of the spaces above those structures
9
are denied without prejudice at this time. However, Mountain Club shall promptly
10
produce to General Cable any photos that its expert took of Unit 314, and both parties
11
may have electricians, construction engineers, and other appropriate experts present at
12
the inspection of the units. If the photos of Unit 314 or the visual inspection of Units
13
314 or 327 provide some reasonable indication that there is any electric cable or other
14
wiring contained in the spaces above the above-mentioned structures, General Cable
15
may be entitled to physically enter and inspect such spaces. In that event, the parties
16
and their experts shall meet and confer regarding the most appropriate method of
17
facilitating such an inspection.
18
3. The parties shall meet and confer regarding potential dates for the inspection and
19
testing of Units 314 and 327, and cooperate in good faith to reserve the units for the
20
selected date(s).
21
4. General Cable shall bear the reasonable costs of using the subject units during the
22
selected date(s), as discussed in greater detail at the telephonic conference.
23
5. If the parties wish to modify the pretrial scheduling order, they shall jointly submit to
24
the court a new set of proposed scheduling deadlines, bearing in mind that such new
25
proposed deadlines shall not modify the final pretrial conference or trial dates.
26
////
27
////
28
////
2
1
2
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 4, 2015
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?