The Mountain Club Owner's Association v. Graybar Electric Company, Inc.

Filing 61

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/4/15. General Cable is directed to perform cable replacement in accordance with this order; the parties shall meet and confer regarding potential dates and cooperate in good faith; General Cable shall bear the reasonable costs as discussed in detail at the telephonic conference; if the parties wish to modify the pretrial scheduling order they shall submit a joint proposed schedule. (Manzer, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 THE MOUNTAIN CLUB OWNER’S ASSOCIATION, Plaintiff, 13 14 15 16 No. 2:13-cv-1835-WBS-KJN ORDER v. GRAYBAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC., Defendant. 17 18 On July 30, 2015, the court, at the parties’ request, conducted an informal discovery 19 teleconference in this matter. Diana Lofti appeared on behalf of plaintiff The Mountain Club 20 Owner’s Association (“Mountain Club”) and Philip Ward appeared on behalf of Third-Party 21 Defendant General Cable Corporation (“General Cable”). For the reasons discussed with the 22 parties at the teleconference, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 23 1. General Cable may remove a length of originally-installed electric armored cable 24 located in the void space above two layers of sheetrock in the ceiling of Unit 327 25 which is connected to the suspended light fixture in that unit, and shall then replace 26 the length of cable with an appropriate electric cable in compliance with all applicable 27 codes. General Cable shall bear the costs related to removal of the cable and restoring 28 the property to its original condition subsequent to the removal. The parties shall 1 1 further meet and confer regarding (a) the procedure for selecting the electrician and 2 other appropriate contractors to perform the removal and restoration; (b) any necessary 3 certifications or indemnifications for the work and restoration to be performed; and (c) 4 the protocol for testing any removed cable, including which party(ies) will have 5 custody of the removed cable. 2. General Cable’s requests to cut a hole in, or remove a section of, two layers of 6 7 sheetrock ceiling in Unit 327 and the plywood sheeting in the attic space above Unit 8 327 to permit physical entry and visual inspection of the spaces above those structures 9 are denied without prejudice at this time. However, Mountain Club shall promptly 10 produce to General Cable any photos that its expert took of Unit 314, and both parties 11 may have electricians, construction engineers, and other appropriate experts present at 12 the inspection of the units. If the photos of Unit 314 or the visual inspection of Units 13 314 or 327 provide some reasonable indication that there is any electric cable or other 14 wiring contained in the spaces above the above-mentioned structures, General Cable 15 may be entitled to physically enter and inspect such spaces. In that event, the parties 16 and their experts shall meet and confer regarding the most appropriate method of 17 facilitating such an inspection. 18 3. The parties shall meet and confer regarding potential dates for the inspection and 19 testing of Units 314 and 327, and cooperate in good faith to reserve the units for the 20 selected date(s). 21 4. General Cable shall bear the reasonable costs of using the subject units during the 22 selected date(s), as discussed in greater detail at the telephonic conference. 23 5. If the parties wish to modify the pretrial scheduling order, they shall jointly submit to 24 the court a new set of proposed scheduling deadlines, bearing in mind that such new 25 proposed deadlines shall not modify the final pretrial conference or trial dates. 26 //// 27 //// 28 //// 2 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 4, 2015 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?