Lennear, et al v. Diamond Pet Food Processors of California, LLC et al

Filing 24

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/19/14 DENYING 21 Motion to Compel save and except to the extent of the representations made by defense counsel on the record at the 12/19/14 hearing with respect to the discovery responses already provided. (Manzer, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11
12

LELAND LENNEAR AND NARVELL
HENRY, SR.,
Plaintiffs,

13

ORDER
v.

14
15
16
17

No. 2:13-cv-1871 TLN DAD

DIAMOND PET FOOD PROCESSORS
OF CALIFORNIA, LLC; DIAMOND PET
FOOD PROCESSORS OF RIPON, LLC;
SCHELL & KAMPETER, INC. d/b/a/
DIAMOND PET FOODS,
Defendants.

18
19

On December 19, 2014, this matter came before the undersigned for hearing of plaintiffs’

20
21

motion to compel. Attorney Bryan McCormack appeared telephonically on behalf of the

22

plaintiffs and attorney John Hasman appeared telephonically on behalf of the defendants.
Upon consideration of the arguments on file and at the hearing, and for the reasons set

23
24

forth on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiffs’ motion to compel

25

(Dkt. No. 21) is denied save and except to the extent of the representations made by defense

26

/////

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

counsel on the record at the December 19, 2014 hearing with respect to the discovery responses

2

already provided.

3

Dated: December 19, 2014

4
5
6

DAD:6
Ddad1\orders.civil\lennear1871.oah.121914.docx

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2