MacGregor v. Dial et al

Filing 50

ORDER signed by Judge Lawrence K. Karlton on 6/4/14 ADOPTING IN FULL 38 Findings and Recommendations; DENYING 21 Motion to Stay. (Meuleman, A)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KEVIN ANTHONY MACGREGOR,

12

No. 2:13-cv-1883 LKK AC P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

DR. DIAL, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief

18

under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to

19

28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

20

On March 27, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein

21

which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to

22

the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty-one days. Neither party has

23

filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

24

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be

25

supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY

26

ORDERED that:

27

1. The findings and recommendations filed March 27, 2014, are adopted in full;

28

2. Plaintiff’s amended motion to stay (ECF No. 21) is denied for the reasons set forth in
1

1

the previously issued Findings and Recommendations (ECF No. 22),1 and because the amended

2

motion is duplicative of the original motion to stay (ECF No. 14).

3

DATED: June 4, 2014.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

1

The November 27, 2013 findings and recommendations (ECF No. 22) were adopted by order
filed April 1, 2014. See ECF No. 39.
2