MacGregor v. Dial et al

Filing 69

ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 1/5/2015 AFFIRMING the decision of the Magistrate Judge re 63 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Michel, G)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KEVIN ANTHONY MACGREGOR,

12

No. 2:13-cv-1883 JAM AC P

Plaintiff,

13

v.

14

DR. DIAL, et al.,

15

ORDER

Defendants.

16
17

On November 24, 2014, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate

18

judge’s order filed November 7, 2014, denying plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel.

19

Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge’s orders shall be upheld unless “clearly

20

erroneous or contrary to law.” Id. Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not

21

appear that the magistrate judge’s ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

22

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the

23

magistrate judge filed November 7, 2014, is affirmed.

24

DATED: January 5, 2015

25

/s/ John A. Mendez_______________________

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

27
28