Clark v. Herrera et al

Filing 12

FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 9/18/14 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

QUINTERRIOUS CLARK,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

No. 2:13-cv-1885 JAM DAD P

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

M. HERRERA et al.,

15

Defendants.

16
By order filed August 5, 2014, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to

17
18

file an amended complaint was granted. Thirty days from that date have now passed, and

19

plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without

20
21

prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

22

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

23

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

24

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections

25

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

26

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

27

/////

28

/////
1

1

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

2

(9th Cir. 1991).

3

Dated: September 18, 2014

4
5
6

DAD:9
clar1885.fta

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2