Clark v. Herrera et al
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 12/11/14 denying 15 Motion to Amend the Complaint. Within 30 days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall file an amended complaint that complies with this court's 08/05/14 screening order 9 , the Civil Rights ACt, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local rules of Practice. (Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
QUINTERRIOUS CLARK,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
No. 2:13-cv-1885 JAM DAD P
ORDER
M. HERRERA et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action seeking relief
17
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
19
On November 24, 2014, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to amend his complaint.
20
Plaintiff’s motion was not, however, accompanied by a proposed amended complaint as required.
21
As a prisoner, plaintiff’s pleadings are subject to evaluation by this court pursuant to the in forma
22
pauperis statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Since plaintiff did not submit a proposed amended
23
complaint, the court is unable to evaluate it. In any event, in the court’s prior screening order, the
24
court dismissed plaintiff’s original complaint and granted him leave to file an amended
25
complaint. As such, no motion for leave to amend by plaintiff is necessary.
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1. Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend (Doc. No. 15) is denied; and
3
2. Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall file an amended
4
complaint that complies with this court’s August 5, 2014 screening order (Doc. No. 9), the Civil
5
Rights Act, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the Local Rules of Practice. Failure to
6
comply with this order will result in a recommendation for dismissal of this action.
7
Dated: December 11, 2014
8
9
10
11
DAD:9
clar1885.10b
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?