Konkle v. Aerotek, Inc.
Filing
13
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 10/22/2015 DISMISSING CASE with prejudice; pursuant to FRCP 41(a). CASE CLOSED (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
BENJAMIN L. WEBSTER, Bar No. 132230
KELSEY E. PAPST, Bar No. 270547
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
500 Capitol Mall
Suite 2000
Sacramento, CA 95814
Telephone:
916.830.7200
Fax No.:
916.561.0828
5
6
Attorneys for Defendant
AEROTEK, INC., A MARYLAND
CORPORATION
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SHIRLEY KONKLE, an individual,
11
12
13
Case No. 2:13-CV-01905-MCE-DAD
Plaintiff,
v.
AEROTEK, INC., a Maryland
Corporation,
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS
ACTION PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A) OF
THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE
14
Defendant.
15
16
Plaintiff SHIRLEY KONKLE (“Plaintiff”) and Defendant AEROTEK, INC., a
17
Maryland Corporation (“Defendant”) (collectively, the “Parties”), by and through their counsel, do
18
hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
19
WHEREAS, on July 16, 2013, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in the above-captioned
20
matter against Defendant in the Superior Court of California for the County of Sacramento, Case No.
21
34-2013-00148247; and
22
WHEREAS, on September 13, 2013, Defendant removed this action to the United
23
States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Case No. 2:13-cv-01905-MCE-DAD,
24
pursuant to diversity jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1332; and
25
WHEREAS, the Parties have entered into a Confidential Settlement Agreement and
26
Release of All Claims, effectuating a resolution of this dispute; and
27
WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a), the Parties agree that
28
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A) OF THE FEDERAL RULES
OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
1
this case can and should be dismissed, with prejudice.
2
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED that the above-
3
captioned matter shall be dismissed, with prejudice. Defendant shall bear its own fees and costs in
4
connection with the proceedings before this Court, and Plaintiff shall bear her own fees and costs in
5
connection with the proceedings before this Court.
6
SO STIPULATED.
7
8
Dated:
October 21, 2015
LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C.
9
10
/s/ Benjamin L. Webster
BENJAMIN L. WEBSTER
KELSEY E. PAPST
Attorneys for Defendant
AEROTEK, INC., A MARYLAND
CORPORATION
11
12
13
14
15
Dated:
October 21, 2015
16
/s/ R. Jeremy Adamson
R. JEREMY ADAMSON
Attorney for Plaintiff
SHIRLEY KONKLE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
KUNZLER LAW GROUP
ORDER
Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation and Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: October 22, 2015
24
25
26
27
28
2.
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO DISMISS ACTION PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A) OF THE FEDERAL RULES
OF CIVIL PROCEDURE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?