Ortega v. Gipson

Filing 47

ORDER signed by Senior Judge James K. Singleton on 08/02/17 ORDERING that the 46 Motion to Proceed IFP is GRANTED (cc: USCA). (Benson, A.)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
VICTOR ANTHONY ORTEGA,
Petitioner,
vs.

No. 2:13-cv-01913-JKS
ORDER
[Re: Motion at Docket No. 46]

M. ELIOT SPEARMAN, Warden, High
Desert State Prison,
Respondent.
This Court denied Victor Anthony Ortega, a state prisoner now proceeding pro se, habeas
relief on June 15, 2017. Docket Nos. 41, 42. The Court granted a certificate of appealability as
to his claim that trial counsel was ineffective for failing to obtain forensic expert evidence. Id.
Ortega timely filed a notice of appeal, dated June 23, 2017, which was processed to the Ninth
Circuit Court of Appeals. Docket Nos. 43, 44. At Docket No. 46, Ortega now moves to proceed
in forma pauperis (“IFP”) on appeal.
Although Ortega’s appeal is currently pending before the Ninth Circuit, “[t]he decision to
allow an appeal to proceed in forma pauperis remains within the jurisdiction of the trial court
after the filing of an appeal.” Zambrano v. Gipson, No. LA CV 15-01794, 2016 WL 4040649, at
*1 (C.D. Cal. July 6, 2016) (citation omitted). A person may be granted permission to proceed
in forma pauperis if the person “submits an affidavit that includes a statement of all assets such
[person] possesses [and] that the person is unable to pay such fees or give security therefor.
Such affidavit shall state the nature of the action, defense or appeal and affiant’s belief that the
person is entitled to redress.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1); Lopez v. Smith, 203 F.3d 1122, 1129 (9th
Cir. 2000) (en banc) (stating that this provision applies to all actions filed in forma pauperis, not

just prisoner actions). “‘[T]he supporting affidavits [must] state the facts as to [the] affiant’s
poverty with some particularity, definiteness and certainty.’” United States v. McQuade, 647
F.2d 938, 940 (9th Cir. 1981) (quoting Jefferson v. United States, 277 F.2d 823, 725 (9th Cir.
1960)).
In support of his application, Ortega submits a declaration and account statement
indicating that he has no assets or income. Ortega is thus within the parameters necessary to
grant an IFP application. Accordingly, his application to proceed on appeal without the payment
of a filing fee is granted.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT the Motion for Leave to Proceed on Appeal in
Forma Pauperis at Docket No. 46 is GRANTED.
Dated: August 2, 2017.
/s/James K. Singleton, Jr.
JAMES K. SINGLETON, JR.
Senior United States District Judge

2