VanBuren v. Eckgaurd

Filing 4

ORDER AND FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dale A. Drozd on 10/21/2013 ORDERING that this case be randomly assigned to a District Judge; and RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections due within 14 days. (Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

MAURICE VAN BUREN,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.

ORDER AND

DOUGLAS ECKGAURD,

15

No. 2:13-cv-01916 DAD P

FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS

Defendant.

16
17

By order filed September 23, 2013, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed and thirty days

18

leave to file an amended complaint was granted. Plaintiff was also granted thirty days to either

19

pay the filing fee or to submit an application to proceed in forma pauperis. Thirty days from that

20

date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, submitted the filing fee

21

or application to proceed in forma pauperis, or otherwise responded to the court’s order.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case be randomly assigned to a District

22
23
24
25

Judge.
Also, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.
See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

26

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge

27

assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days

28

after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections
1

1

with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings

2

and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified

3

time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153

4

(9th Cir. 1991).

5

Dated: October 21, 2013

6
7
8
9

DAD:4
vanb1916.fta-fifp

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2