Conservation Congress v. US Forest Service et al

Filing 19

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/23/2014 ORDERING 18 that Plaintiff may file a response in opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss due by 2/10/2014; and Defendants reply due by 2/20/2014. (Reader, L)

1
2
3

Rachel Fazio (CA Bar # 187580)
PO Box 897
Big Bear, CA 92314
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

4
5
6
7

Sean Malone (OR Bar # 084060) (admitted pro hac vice)
259 E.5th Ave, Ste200-G
Eugene, OR 97401
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]

8
9
10
11

Elisabeth A. Holmes (OR Bar # 120254) (admitted pro hac vice)
Blue River Law, P.C.
P.O. Box 293
Eugene, OR 97440
Tel: [phone]
[e-mail]

12
13
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

CONSERVATION CONGRESS, a nonprofit
organization,
Plaintiff,
v.
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE;
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE
SERVICE,
Defendants

CASE NO. 13-cv-01922-TLN-CMK
STIPULATION TO RESET ORAL
ARGUMENT ON DEFENDANTS’
MOTION TO DISMISS, PROPOSED
BRIEFING SCHEDULE, AND ORDER

23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

STIPULATION TO RESET ORAL ARGUMENT, PROPOSED BRIEIFING SCHEDULE
AND ORDER

1

1

The parties have conferred and stipulate that oral argument on Defendants’ Motion to

2

Dismiss should be reset from the current date of February 13, 2014, to February 27, 2014. The

3

parties have agreed to reset the oral argument date because of miscommunication between the parties

4

regarding the availability of counsel for Plaintiff during the current hearing date of February 13,

5

2014. Counsel for Plaintiff has a previously scheduled family vacation during the current date of

6

February 13, 2014. Counsel for Defendants has a deposition on February 27, 2014, at 10:00 a.m.,

7

but will be able to adjust the deposition schedule if this stipulation is granted. The parties

8

respectfully request that they be placed first on the Court’s argument calendar to accommodate this

9

scheduling constraint.

10

The parties have also conferred and stipulate to the following briefing schedule on

11

Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss:

12

Plaintiff files a response in opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

February 10, 2014

13

Defendants file a reply in support of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss

February 20, 2014

14
15

Respectfully submitted,

16
17

DATED: January 22, 2014

18

By

19
20

/s/ Sean Malone
Attorney for Plaintiff
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER
United States Attorney

21
By:

22
23

/s/ Gregory T. Broderick
GREGORY T. BRODERICK
Assistant United States Attorney

24
25
26
27
28
29
30

STIPULATION TO RESET ORAL ARGUMENT, PROPOSED BRIEIFING SCHEDULE
AND ORDER

2

ORDER

1
2

IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4

Dated: January 23, 2014

5
6
7
8
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30

STIPULATION TO RESET ORAL ARGUMENT, PROPOSED BRIEIFING SCHEDULE
AND ORDER

3