Conservation Congress v. US Forest Service et al

Filing 31

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/2/15 re: 30 ORDERING to Extend Time for Lodging Administrative Record up to and including 6/8/15. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney GREGORY T. BRODERICK Assistant United States Attorney 501 I Street, Suite 10-100 Sacramento, CA 95814 Telephone: (916) 554-2700 Facsimile: (916) 554-2900 5 Attorneys for United States 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 14 CONSERVATION CONGRESS, a nonprofit organization, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO. 2:13-cv-01922-TLN-CMK STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR LODGING ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE; UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff challenges the Bagley Hazard Tree Abatement project in the Shasta-Trinity National 17 Forest. Pursuant to this Court’s prior order, entered upon stipulation of the parties, the administrative 18 record in the matter is due June 1, 2015. (Dkt. No. 29). Because the parties are currently discussing 19 resolution, and because counsel for the United States begins a trial on Tuesday, June 2, 2015 (Case No. 20 2:13-01699-GEB-KJN), the parties hereby stipulate to an extension up to and including June 8, 2015, for 21 lodging the certified record. 22 Respectfully submitted, 23 DATED: June 1, 2015 24 By: 25 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 26 27 28 29 30 /s/ Sean Malone (auth 6/1/15) Attorney for Plaintiff By: /s/ Gregory T. Broderick GREGORY T. BRODERICK Assistant United States Attorney STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR LODGING RECORD 1 ORDER 1 2 IT IS SO ORDERED. 3 4 Dated: June 2, 2015 5 6 7 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR LODGING RECORD 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?