Conservation Congress v. US Forest Service et al

Filing 68

ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/16/16 ORDERING Plaintiff's opening brief Deadline: 11/21/2016, Defendants' combined opening brief and response Deadline: 12/23/2016, Plaintiff's combined response and reply due by 1/6/2017, Defendants' reply due by 1/27/2017.(Washington, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Rachel Fazio (CA Bar # 187580) P.O. Box 697 Cedar Ridge, CA 95924 Tel: (530) 273-9290 Fax: (530) 273-9260 rachelmfazio@gmail.com Sean Malone (OR Bar # 084060) (Pro Hac Vice) 259 E.5th Ave, Ste200-G Eugene, OR 97401 Tel: (303) 859-0403 Fax: (650) 471-7366 seanmalone8@hotmail.com Elisabeth Holmes (OR Bar # 120254) (Pro Hac Vice) Blue River Law, P.C. P.O. Box 293 Eugene, OR 97440 Tel. (541) 870-7722 eli.blueriverlaw@gmail.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 16 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 17 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 18 19 20 CONSERVATION CONGRESS, a non-profit organization, Plaintiff, 21 22 23 24 25 vs. UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 13-cv-01922-TLN-CMK PROPOSED ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE PROPOSED ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE - 1 1 2 The Parties’ Joint Stipulated Motion on Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule is hereby ALLOWED. The Parties’ briefing schedule is as follows: 3 4 5 6 7 November 21, 2016 Plaintiff’s opening brief December 23, 2016 Defendants’ combined opening brief and response January 6, 2017 Plaintiff’s combined response and reply January 27, 2017 Defendants’ reply 8 9 Each side shall limit its total briefing to fifty (50) pages. 10 11 12 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: November 16, 2016 13 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 PROPOSED ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE - 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?