Conservation Congress v. US Forest Service et al
Filing
68
ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING SCHEDULE signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/16/16 ORDERING Plaintiff's opening brief Deadline: 11/21/2016, Defendants' combined opening brief and response Deadline: 12/23/2016, Plaintiff's combined response and reply due by 1/6/2017, Defendants' reply due by 1/27/2017.(Washington, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Rachel Fazio (CA Bar # 187580)
P.O. Box 697
Cedar Ridge, CA 95924
Tel: (530) 273-9290
Fax: (530) 273-9260
rachelmfazio@gmail.com
Sean Malone (OR Bar # 084060) (Pro Hac Vice)
259 E.5th Ave, Ste200-G
Eugene, OR 97401
Tel: (303) 859-0403
Fax: (650) 471-7366
seanmalone8@hotmail.com
Elisabeth Holmes (OR Bar # 120254) (Pro Hac Vice)
Blue River Law, P.C.
P.O. Box 293
Eugene, OR 97440
Tel. (541) 870-7722
eli.blueriverlaw@gmail.com
Attorneys for Plaintiff
16
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
19
20
CONSERVATION CONGRESS, a
non-profit organization,
Plaintiff,
21
22
23
24
25
vs.
UNITED STATES FOREST
SERVICE, UNITED STATES
FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 13-cv-01922-TLN-CMK
PROPOSED ORDER ON
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
PROPOSED ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING
SCHEDULE - 1
1
2
The Parties’ Joint Stipulated Motion on Summary Judgment Briefing
Schedule is hereby ALLOWED. The Parties’ briefing schedule is as follows:
3
4
5
6
7
November 21, 2016
Plaintiff’s opening brief
December 23, 2016
Defendants’ combined opening brief and response
January 6, 2017
Plaintiff’s combined response and reply
January 27, 2017
Defendants’ reply
8
9
Each side shall limit its total briefing to fifty (50) pages.
10
11
12
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: November 16, 2016
13
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
PROPOSED ORDER ON SUMMARY JUDGMENT BRIEFING
SCHEDULE - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?