Rogers v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
Filing
45
ORDER DISMISSING CASE pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1) with prejudice signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/3/14. CASE CLOSED. (Manzer, C)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
VIRGINIA ROGERS,
12
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
Defendants.
DIEDE CONSTRUCTION, INC.,
Third-Party Plaintiff,
18
19
20
21
ORDER
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER
CORPORATION, ET AL.,
16
17
No. 2:13-cv-1932 AC
v.
SKYLINE SCAFFOLD, INC.,
Third-Party Defendant,
22
23
Based on the consent of the parties, this matter was reassigned to the undersigned on
24
October 31, 2013. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c); ECF Nos. 14–17. On October 30, 2014, plaintiff filed
25
a notice of voluntary dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). ECF No. 44. The
26
notice is signed by all parties who have appeared and dismisses plaintiff’s action and third-party
27
plaintiff’s action with prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) (a plaintiff may dismiss an
28
action without a court order by filing “a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have
1
1
2
appeared”).
Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, this action and the corresponding third-party complaint
3
are DISMISSED with prejudice. Accordingly, all previously set deadlines and hearings are
4
VACATED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this action.
5
6
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: November 3, 2014
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?