Revada v. Heise, et al.

Filing 18

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/12/13 ORDERING that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DIMETRI M. REVADA, 12 No. 2:13-cv-1941 KJN P Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 R. HEISE, et al., 15 ORDER Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff consented to proceed before the undersigned for all purposes. See 28 U.S.C. 18 § 636(c). By order filed October 22, 2013, plaintiff was ordered to show cause, within fourteen 19 days, why this action should not be dismissed based on plaintiff’s failure to file a signed civil 20 rights complaint as required by the court’s September 12, 2013 order. Fourteen days have now 21 passed, and plaintiff has not shown cause or otherwise responded to the court’s order. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice. 23 See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 Dated: November 12, 2013 25 26 reva1941.fsc 27 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?