Thompson v. Jones et al

Filing 63

STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on 4/9/2015 ORDERING that this action against Defendant Suzanne McClary is DISMISSED with prejudice. All parties to bear their own costs and attorneys fees. CASE CLOSED. (Zignago, K.)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DAVID ALLEN THOMPSON, SR. AU 9252 P.O. Box 600 Tracy, CA 95378-0600 Plaintiff in Pro Per CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP ROBERT L. CHALFANT, SBN 203051 Email: rlc@creggerlaw.com JAROM B. PHIPPS, SBN 296612 Email: jp@creggerlaw.com 1030 G Street Sacramento, CA 95814 Phone: 916.443-4443 Fax: 916.443-2124 Attorneys for Defendants SUZANNE McCLARY 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 14 15 16 DAVID ALLEN THOMPSON, SR., Plaintiff, 17 18 19 20 vs. Civil Action No.: 2:13-cv-01951 MCE CKD STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER THEREON SCOTT R. JONES, RICK PATTISON, E. BUEHLER, KEVIN STEED, McCLARY, R. BILGERU, Defendants. 21 22 23 24 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties to this action through their 25 attorneys of record that the above-captioned action be and hereby is dismissed with prejudice 26 pursuant to FRCP 41(a)(1). Each party is to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees. 27 /// 28 CREGGER & CHALFANT, LLP. 1030 G St. Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 443-4443 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER THEREON 1 1 2 3 DATE: February 23, 2015 /s/ David Allen Thompson, Sr. DAVID ALLEN THOMPSON SR. Plaintiff In Pro Per 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 DATE: February 17, 2015 11 CREGGER & CHALFANT LLP /s/ Robert L. Chalfant ROBERT L.CHALFANT Attorney for Defendants 12 13 14 ORDER 15 16 17 18 19 Pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, this action against Defendant SUZANNE McCLARY is dismissed with prejudice. All parties to bear their own costs and attorneys’ fees. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: April 9, 2015 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CREGGER & CHALFANT, LLP. 1030 G St. Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 443-4443 STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; ORDER THEREON 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?