Garcia v. California Department of Correction & Rehabilitation, et al

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 7/18/14 DENYING 14 15 Motions to Appoint Counsel; GRANTING 14 15 Motions for Extension. Plaintiff is GRANTED an additional 60 days to file an amended complaint, but there will be no further extension; and the Clerk is DIRECTED to re-serve plaintiff with a copy of the 6 1/22/14 order. (Meuleman, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANNY R. GARCIA, 12 13 14 15 No. 2:13-cv-1952 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER C/O HEATH, et al., Defendants. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action, has again requested appointment of counsel and an extension of time to file an amended complaint. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that district courts lack authority to require 20 counsel to represent indigent prisoners in § 1983 cases. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court, 490 21 U.S. 296, 298 (1989). In certain exceptional circumstances, the district court may request the 22 voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1). Terrell v. Brewer, 935 F.2d 23 1015, 1017 (9th Cir. 1991); Wood v. Housewright, 900 F.2d 1332, 1335-36 (9th Cir. 1990). 24 The test for exceptional circumstances requires the court to evaluate the plaintiff’s 25 likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of the plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in 26 light of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Palmer v. Valdez, 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th 27 Cir. 2009) (district court did not abuse discretion in declining to appoint counsel); see also, 28 Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1986); Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 1 1 954 (9th Cir. 1983). The burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances is on the plaintiff. 2 Palmer, supra. As has been previously explained to plaintiff (ECF No. 13), circumstances 3 common to most prisoners, such as lack of legal education and limited law library access, do not 4 establish exceptional circumstances that warrant a request for voluntary assistance of counsel. 5 Plaintiff asserts that he is seeking appointment of counsel because his mind has been affected by 6 the chemotherapy treatments he is undergoing for lymphoma. ECF No. 15. 7 In his June 4, 2014 request for appointment of counsel and for an extension of time, 8 plaintiff informs the court that he is in the prison infirmary without “access to anything” 9 undergoing chemotherapy which he approximated would take at that point an additional 60 days. 10 ECF No. 14. In his second request, plaintiff indicates he is no longer in the infirmary but at this 11 time his property cannot be located. ECF No. 15. 12 The complaint was dismissed with leave to amend within thirty days by order filed on 13 January 22, 2014. In the dismissal order, the court explained the deficiencies of the complaint in 14 some detail. ECF No. 6. The court has previously granted plaintiff two extensions of time 15 amounting to an additional 60 days to file his amended complaint. ECF Nos. 11, 13. The court 16 will direct the Clerk to re-serve the order dismissing the case and will grant plaintiff a final, 17 additional 60 days to file an amended complaint. 18 Having considered the factors under Palmer, the court finds that plaintiff has failed to 19 meet his burden of demonstrating exceptional circumstances warranting the appointment of 20 counsel at this time. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 22 1. Plaintiff’s June 4, 2014 and July 7, 2014 motions for the appointment of counsel (ECF 23 Nos. 14 and 15) are denied; 24 2. Plaintiff’s motions for an extension of time at ECF Nos. 14 and 15 are granted; 25 3. Plaintiff is granted an additional 60 days to file an amended complaint, but there will 26 be no further extension; and 27 //// 28 //// 2 1 4. The Clerk is directed to re-serve plaintiff with a copy of the January 22, 2014 order at 2 ECF No. 6. 3 DATED: July 18, 2014 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?