Repo-Med Systems, Inc. v. Emed Technologies Corportation
Filing
118
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 9/15/2016 ORDERING that Defendant's 107 Motion to Compel is GRANTED IN PART. Within seven days, plaintiff shall produce responsive documents that were generated prior to the litigation. Responsive documents generated after the initiation of the litigation shall be produced within twenty-one days. Documents responsive to requests nos. 57 and 58 may be limited to 5/14/2015 to the present. (Zignago, K.)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
REPRO-MED SYSTEMS, INC.,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
No. 2:13-cv-1957 TLN CKD
v.
ORDER
EMED TECHNOLOGIES
CORPORATION,
Defendant.
16
17
18
Defendant’s motion to compel came on regularly for hearing on September 14, 2016.
19
John Lomas appeared telephonically for plaintiff. Eric Grant appeared for defendant. Upon
20
review of the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and
21
good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
Defendant’s motion to compel (ECF No. 107) is granted in part. Within seven days,
22
23
plaintiff shall produce responsive documents that were generated prior to the litigation.
24
Responsive documents generated after the initiation of the litigation shall be produced within
25
/////
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
twenty-one days. Documents responsive to requests nos. 57 and 58 may be limited to May 14,
2
2015 to the present.
3
Dated: September 15, 2016
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
4 rms-emed1957.oah
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?