Repo-Med Systems, Inc. v. Emed Technologies Corportation
Filing
154
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/29/2017 GRANTING Plaintiff's request to Seal; the Clerk of the Court is directed to file under SEAL the complete un-redacted versions of the referenced documents; this document shall remain under seal indefinitely, pending further order of this Court; Counsel for the parties are to be permitted access to this document. (Reader, L)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO
11
12 REPRO-MED SYSTEMS, INC. (d/b/a RMS
MEDICAL PRODUCTS),
13
Plaintiff and Counterclaim14
Defendant,
15
Case No. 2:13-cv-01957-TLN-CKD
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF AND
COUNTERCLAIM-DEFENDANT
REPRO-MED SYSTEMS, INC.'S NOTICE
OF REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS
v.
16 EMED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,
17
Defendant and CounterclaimPlaintiff.
18
19
20
Plaintiff and Counter-Defendant Repro-Med Systems, Inc. (d/b/a RMS Medical Products),
21 (“RMS”) requests an order to allow it to file under seal the following documents because they
22 contain information which RMS has designated as Confidential-Attorneys’ Eyes Only:
23
1.
Plaintiff and Counterclaim-Defendant Repro-Med Systems, Inc.'s Memorandum of
24
Points and Authorities in Support of its Motion for Reciprocal Preliminary
25
Injunction (including Exhibits B, C, E, J, and M).
26
Upon consideration of the pleadings, the papers, and the arguments of counsel, and with
27 compelling reason shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
28
RMS’s Request to Seal is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file under
1 seal the complete, unredacted versions of the above-referenced documents. This document shall
2 remain under seal indefinitely, pending further order of this Court. Counsel for the parties are to
3 be permitted access to this document.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6 Dated: August 29, 2017
7
8
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?