Repo-Med Systems, Inc. v. Emed Technologies Corportation

Filing 65

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 11/14/2014 GRANTING 62 Emed Technologies Corporation Request to SEAL Documents; the Clerk of the Court is directed to file UNDER SEAL the complete, unredacted versions of the referenced documents; the documents shall remain under seal indefinitely, pending further Order of this Court; Counsel for the parties are permitted to have access to this document. (Reader, L)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Oliver W. Wanger (SBN 40331)
Patrick D. Toole (SBN 190118)
Josiah M. Prendergast (SBN 292840)
Micaela L. Neal (SBN 287107)
WANGER JONES HELSLEY PC
265 E. River Park Circle, Suite 310
Fresno, CA 93720
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-mail:
[e-mail]
Alexander M. Medina (SBN 222015)
Daniel J. Croxall (SBN 258390)
MEDINA MCKELVEY LLP
983 Reserve Drive
Roseville, CA 95678
Telephone: [phone]
E-mail:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
EMED Technologies Corporation

12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SACRAMENTO DIVISION

14
15
16
17

REPRO-MED SYSTEMS, INC.
(d/b/a RMS MEDICAL PRODUCTS),
Plaintiff and CounterDefendant,

18
19
20
21
22

v.
EMED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION,
Defendant and
Counterclaimant.

Case No. 2:13-CV-01957-TLN-CKD
ORDER RE DEFENDANT AND
COUNTERCLAIMANT EMED
TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION’S
REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS
Date:
Time:
Courtroom:
Judge:

November 20, 2014
2:00 p.m.
2
Hon. Troy L. Nunley

23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER RE EMED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION’S REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS

1
2

ORDER
Defendant and Counterclaimant EMED Technologies Corporation (“EMED”) requests that

3

the Court issue an Order allowing it to file the following documents, designated as “Highly

4

Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only,” under seal:

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

1.

Defendant and Counterclaimant EMED’s Reply in support of EMED’s Motion for

Preliminary Injunction;
2.

Supplemental Declaration of Joseph Barbrie in support of EMED’s Motion for

Preliminary Injunction (including exhibits);
3.

Supplemental Declaration of Peter Kollings in support of EMED’s Motion for

Preliminary Injunction (including exhibits);
4.

Supplemental Declaration of Paul Lambert in support of EMED’s Motion for

Preliminary Injunction (including exhibits); and
5.

Declaration of Josiah Prendergast in support of EMED’s Motion for Preliminary

Injunction (including exhibits).
Upon consideration of the pleadings and papers on file, the arguments of counsel, and with
good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:
EMED’s Request to Seal is GRANTED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file under

18

seal the complete, unredacted versions of the above-referenced documents. The documents shall

19

remain under seal indefinitely, pending further Order of this Court. Counsel for the parties are

20

permitted to have access to this document.

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED

23
24
25

Dated: November 14, 2014

26
27
28

Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge

1
ORDER RE EMED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION’S REQUEST TO SEAL DOCUMENTS