Schroeder v. Woo et al

Filing 13

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 12/3/2014 ORDERING counsel to meet and confer regarding the pending discovery dispute by 12/19/2014; VACATING the Motion Hearing on 12 Motion to Compel set for 12/31/2014; ORDERING the parties to file a joint statement regarding said dispute in the format set forth under L.R. 251 by 1/8/2015. (Michel, G)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BILL SCHROEDER, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-1964 GEB CKD v. ORDER WILLARD WOO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Calendared for hearing on December 31, 2014 is plaintiff’s motion to compel. Upon 17 18 review of plaintiff’s memorandum, and good cause appearing, THE COURT FINDS AND 19 ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Once again, plaintiff’s counsel and defense counsel are before the court on a discovery 20 21 dispute that appears to be readily resolvable if counsel were to meet and confer in good faith. 22 Both counsel are experienced in ADA matters; both counsel understand their discovery 23 obligations and what constitutes a proper response to the propounded discovery. Counsel are 24 therefore ordered to meet and confer no later than December 19, 2014 regarding the pending 25 discovery dispute. During the meet and confer, defense counsel should clarify whether any claim 26 of financial hardship will be made. 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 The hearing date of December 31, 2014 is vacated. No later than January 8, 2015, the 2 parties shall file a joint statement regarding the dispute in the format set forth under Local Rule 3 251. The matter shall thereafter stand submitted. 4 Dated: December 3, 2014 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 5 6 7 8 4 schroeder-woo.subm 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?