Gianelli v. Home Depot Incorporated
Filing
16
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/31/14: No later than August 11, 2014, plaintiff shall submit for in camera review unredacted copies of responsive documents for which a claim of attorney client privilege is made, along with copies of the redacted documents previously served on defendant. The documents shall be Bates stamped. Plaintiff shall also at that time serve on defendant and the court a privilege log. The matter shall thereafter stand submitted. (Kaminski, H)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
SHEILA GIANELLI,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-1969 JAM CKD PS
v.
ORDER
HOME DEPOT INCORPORATED,
15
Defendant.
16
Defendant’s motion to compel production of documents came on regularly for hearing
17
18
July 30, 2014. Mark Schwartz and Don Dennis, Jr. appeared telephonically for plaintiff. James
19
Conley appeared for defendant. Upon review of the documents in support and opposition, upon
20
hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS
21
AS FOLLOWS:
No later than August 11, 2014, plaintiff shall submit for in camera review unredacted
22
23
copies of responsive documents for which a claim of attorney client privilege is made, along with
24
copies of the redacted documents previously served on defendant. The documents shall be Bates
25
stamped. Plaintiff shall also at that time serve on defendant and the court a privilege log in
26
/////
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5). The matter shall thereafter stand
2
submitted.
3
Dated: July 31, 2014
_____________________________________
CAROLYN K. DELANEY
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
4
5
6
7
4 gianelli.oah.icr
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?