Gianelli v. Home Depot Incorporated

Filing 16

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/31/14: No later than August 11, 2014, plaintiff shall submit for in camera review unredacted copies of responsive documents for which a claim of attorney client privilege is made, along with copies of the redacted documents previously served on defendant. The documents shall be Bates stamped. Plaintiff shall also at that time serve on defendant and the court a privilege log. The matter shall thereafter stand submitted. (Kaminski, H)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHEILA GIANELLI, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-1969 JAM CKD PS v. ORDER HOME DEPOT INCORPORATED, 15 Defendant. 16 Defendant’s motion to compel production of documents came on regularly for hearing 17 18 July 30, 2014. Mark Schwartz and Don Dennis, Jr. appeared telephonically for plaintiff. James 19 Conley appeared for defendant. Upon review of the documents in support and opposition, upon 20 hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS 21 AS FOLLOWS: No later than August 11, 2014, plaintiff shall submit for in camera review unredacted 22 23 copies of responsive documents for which a claim of attorney client privilege is made, along with 24 copies of the redacted documents previously served on defendant. The documents shall be Bates 25 stamped. Plaintiff shall also at that time serve on defendant and the court a privilege log in 26 ///// 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(5). The matter shall thereafter stand 2 submitted. 3 Dated: July 31, 2014 _____________________________________ CAROLYN K. DELANEY UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 4 5 6 7 4 gianelli.oah.icr 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?