Oliver v. State of California et al
Filing
47
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/06/16 vacating 43 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS. Also, RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice based on plaintiff's failure to comply with Local Rule 183(b). Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days.(Plummer, M)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAMES W. OLIVER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2: 13-cv-1974 GEB KJN P
v.
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff is a former state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action
17
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On September 27, 2016, the undersigned recommended that defendant’s motion to dismiss
19
20
be denied. (ECF No. 43.) On October 7, 2016, these findings and recommendations were
21
returned unserved on plaintiff. On October 18, 2016, the undersigned granted defendant’s motion
22
for an extension of time to file objections to the findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 46.)
23
On October 28, 2016, this order was also returned unserved on plaintiff. The September 27, 2016
24
findings and recommendations and October 18, 2016 order were served on plaintiff’s address of
25
record.
26
It appears that plaintiff has failed to comply with Local Rule 183(b), which requires that a
27
party appearing in propria persona inform the court of any address change. It is the plaintiff’s
28
responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local
1
1
2
3
4
5
Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that that September 27, 2016 findings and
recommendations are vacated; and
IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice based
on plaintiff’s failure to comply with Local Rule 183(b).
6
These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge
7
assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days
8
after being served with these findings and recommendations, any party may file written
9
objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned
10
“Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Any response to the
11
objections shall be filed and served within fourteen days after service of the objections. The
12
parties are advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to
13
appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).
14
Dated: December 6, 2016
15
16
17
18
Ol1974.nca
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?