Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service et al
Filing
99
STIPULATION and ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/24/16. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (not to exceed 30 pages) deadline is 7/29/2016. Federal Defendants' Opposition and Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment (30 pages) deadline is 9/9/2016. Defendant-Intervenor's Opposition and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (20 pages) deadline is 9/16/2016. Plaintiff's Combined Opposition/Reply (30 pages) deadline is 10/03/16; Federal Defendants Reply (15 pages) deadline is 10/19/16; Defendant-Intervenor's Reply (10 pages) deadline is 10/19/16. Motion Hearing New date is 12/13/2016 at 01:30 PM. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
1
2
3
4
Dennis L. Porter (Cal. Bar #67176)
Attorney at Law
8120 36th Avenue
Sacramento, California 95824-2304
Telephone: (916) 381-8300
Fax: (916) 381-8726
dlporter2@yahoo.com
5
10
Lawson E. Fite (Ore. Bar #055573), Pro Hac Vice
Scott W. Horngren (Ore. Bar. #880604), Pro Hac Vice
American Forest Resource Council
5100 S.W. Macadam, Suite 350
Portland, Oregon 97239
Telephone: (503) 222-9505
Fax: (503) 222-3255
lfite@amforest.org
shorngren@amforest.org
11
Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenor
6
7
8
9
12
13
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service, et al., No. 2:13-cv-01977-JAM-KJN
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE – Page 1
1
2
CONSERVATION CONGRESS,
No. 2:13-cv-01977-JAM-KJN
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING
BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE
3
v.
4
5
6
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, and
UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE
SERVICE,
7
8
9
10
Defendants,
and
TRINITY RIVER LUMBER COMPANY, a
California Corporation,
11
12
13
Defendant-Intervenor.
Pursuant to L.R. 143 and 144, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate to the following
14
adjustments to the briefing and hearing schedule in this case, which would extend certain deadlines and
15
the hearing date:
16
Deadline
Current date
New date
17
Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary
Judgment (not to exceed 30
pages)
July 6, 2016
July 29, 2016
Federal Defendants’ Opposition
and Cross-Motion for Summary
Judgment (30 pages)
August 10, 2016
September 9, 2016
Defendant-Intervenor’s
Opposition and Cross-Motion
for Summary Judgment (20
pages)
August 17, 2016
September 16, 2016
25
Plaintiff’s Combined
Opposition/Reply (30 pages)
September 1, 2016
October 3, 2016
26
Federal Defendants’ Reply (15
September 15, 2016
October 19, 2016
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
27
28
Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service, et al., No. 2:13-cv-01977-JAM-KJN
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE – Page 2
1
2
3
pages)
Defendant-Intervenor’s Reply
(10 pages)
September 15, 2016
October 19, 2016
Hearing
November 1, 2016 at 1:30 p.m.
December 13, 2016 at 1:30
p.m.
4
5
6
The changes are requested in order to accommodate paternity leave for defendant-intervenor’s
7
counsel, which would otherwise conflict with preparation and filing of defendant-intervenor’s opening
8
brief, and to give additional time to the other parties for preparation of their briefs. In the event the
9
Court wishes to maintain the current hearing date, the parties do not object; however, the parties have
10
suggested a later hearing date in order to maintain the existing length of time between completion of
11
briefing and the hearing, and because not all parties are available on November 15, the next available
12
hearing date after November 1. Additionally, in the event that the Court approves this stipulation the
13
14
parties agree that the current suspension on implementation of the Smokey Project shall remain in place
15
until February 13, 2017 or until the Court issues an order resolving the parties’ cross-motions for
16
summary judgment, whichever is earlier. Trinity reserves its appellate rights regarding previous orders
17
relating to the suspension but does not intend to seek further modification of the suspension from this
18
19
Court or any other Court prior to completion of summary-judgment proceedings in this case.
The parties have not jointly requested a previous continuance of the briefing schedule. Plaintiff
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
previously requested ex parte, and obtained, a 60-day continuance of the merits briefing schedule. See
Dkt. 89, 93.
Accordingly, the parties request the Court approve this Stipulation, and enter the proposed
changes to the briefing and hearing schedule.
Respectfully submitted this 24th day of May, 2016.
/s/ Steven Sugarman (by LEF as authorized
5/23/2016)
JOHN C. CRUDEN
Assistant Attorney General
Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service, et al., No. 2:13-cv-01977-JAM-KJN
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE – Page 3
3
STEVEN SUGARMAN (pro hac vice)
347 County Road 55A
Cerrillos, NM 87010
Tel: (505) 672-5082
Email: stevensugarman@hotmail.com
4
Attorney for Plaintiff
5
/s/ Lawson E. Fite
LAWSON E. FITE, pro hac vice
American Forest Resource Council
5100 S.W. Macadam, Suite 350
Portland, OR 97239
Tel: (503) 222-9505 / Fax: (503) 222-3255
Email: lfite@amforest.org
1
2
6
7
8
9
10
Attorney for Defendant-Intervenor
/s/ Andrea Gelatt (by LEF as authorized
5/24/2016)
TYLER L. BURGESS
Trial Attorney
Natural Resources Section
PO Box 7611
Washington, DC 20044-7611
Tel: (202) 616-4119 / Fax: (202) 305-0506
Email: tyler.burgess@usdoj.gov
ANDREA GELATT
Wildlife & Marine Resources Section
PO Box 7611
Washington, DC 20044-7611
Tel: (202) 305-0210 / Fax: (202) 305-0275
Email: andrea.gelatt@usdoj.gov
Attorneys for Federal Defendants
11
12
The Court having considered the Stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED
13
14
15
Dated: 5/24/2016
/s/ John A. Mendez____________
Hon. John A. Mendez
United States District Court Judge
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service, et al., No. 2:13-cv-01977-JAM-KJN
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE – Page 4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?