Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service et al

Filing 99

STIPULATION and ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 5/24/16. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment (not to exceed 30 pages) deadline is 7/29/2016. Federal Defendants' Opposition and Cross- Motion for Summary Judgment (30 pages) deadline is 9/9/2016. Defendant-Intervenor's Opposition and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (20 pages) deadline is 9/16/2016. Plaintiff's Combined Opposition/Reply (30 pages) deadline is 10/03/16; Federal Defendants Reply (15 pages) deadline is 10/19/16; Defendant-Intervenor's Reply (10 pages) deadline is 10/19/16. Motion Hearing New date is 12/13/2016 at 01:30 PM. (Mena-Sanchez, L)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 Dennis L. Porter (Cal. Bar #67176) Attorney at Law 8120 36th Avenue Sacramento, California 95824-2304 Telephone: (916) 381-8300 Fax: (916) 381-8726 dlporter2@yahoo.com 5 10 Lawson E. Fite (Ore. Bar #055573), Pro Hac Vice Scott W. Horngren (Ore. Bar. #880604), Pro Hac Vice American Forest Resource Council 5100 S.W. Macadam, Suite 350 Portland, Oregon 97239 Telephone: (503) 222-9505 Fax: (503) 222-3255 lfite@amforest.org shorngren@amforest.org 11 Attorneys for Defendant-Intervenor 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service, et al., No. 2:13-cv-01977-JAM-KJN STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE – Page 1 1 2 CONSERVATION CONGRESS, No. 2:13-cv-01977-JAM-KJN Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE 3 v. 4 5 6 UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, and UNITED STATES FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE, 7 8 9 10 Defendants, and TRINITY RIVER LUMBER COMPANY, a California Corporation, 11 12 13 Defendant-Intervenor. Pursuant to L.R. 143 and 144, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate to the following 14 adjustments to the briefing and hearing schedule in this case, which would extend certain deadlines and 15 the hearing date: 16 Deadline Current date New date 17 Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (not to exceed 30 pages) July 6, 2016 July 29, 2016 Federal Defendants’ Opposition and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (30 pages) August 10, 2016 September 9, 2016 Defendant-Intervenor’s Opposition and Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (20 pages) August 17, 2016 September 16, 2016 25 Plaintiff’s Combined Opposition/Reply (30 pages) September 1, 2016 October 3, 2016 26 Federal Defendants’ Reply (15 September 15, 2016 October 19, 2016 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 27 28 Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service, et al., No. 2:13-cv-01977-JAM-KJN STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE – Page 2 1 2 3 pages) Defendant-Intervenor’s Reply (10 pages) September 15, 2016 October 19, 2016 Hearing November 1, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. December 13, 2016 at 1:30 p.m. 4 5 6 The changes are requested in order to accommodate paternity leave for defendant-intervenor’s 7 counsel, which would otherwise conflict with preparation and filing of defendant-intervenor’s opening 8 brief, and to give additional time to the other parties for preparation of their briefs. In the event the 9 Court wishes to maintain the current hearing date, the parties do not object; however, the parties have 10 suggested a later hearing date in order to maintain the existing length of time between completion of 11 briefing and the hearing, and because not all parties are available on November 15, the next available 12 hearing date after November 1. Additionally, in the event that the Court approves this stipulation the 13 14 parties agree that the current suspension on implementation of the Smokey Project shall remain in place 15 until February 13, 2017 or until the Court issues an order resolving the parties’ cross-motions for 16 summary judgment, whichever is earlier. Trinity reserves its appellate rights regarding previous orders 17 relating to the suspension but does not intend to seek further modification of the suspension from this 18 19 Court or any other Court prior to completion of summary-judgment proceedings in this case. The parties have not jointly requested a previous continuance of the briefing schedule. Plaintiff 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 previously requested ex parte, and obtained, a 60-day continuance of the merits briefing schedule. See Dkt. 89, 93. Accordingly, the parties request the Court approve this Stipulation, and enter the proposed changes to the briefing and hearing schedule. Respectfully submitted this 24th day of May, 2016. /s/ Steven Sugarman (by LEF as authorized 5/23/2016) JOHN C. CRUDEN Assistant Attorney General Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service, et al., No. 2:13-cv-01977-JAM-KJN STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE – Page 3 3 STEVEN SUGARMAN (pro hac vice) 347 County Road 55A Cerrillos, NM 87010 Tel: (505) 672-5082 Email: stevensugarman@hotmail.com 4 Attorney for Plaintiff 5 /s/ Lawson E. Fite LAWSON E. FITE, pro hac vice American Forest Resource Council 5100 S.W. Macadam, Suite 350 Portland, OR 97239 Tel: (503) 222-9505 / Fax: (503) 222-3255 Email: lfite@amforest.org 1 2 6 7 8 9 10 Attorney for Defendant-Intervenor /s/ Andrea Gelatt (by LEF as authorized 5/24/2016) TYLER L. BURGESS Trial Attorney Natural Resources Section PO Box 7611 Washington, DC 20044-7611 Tel: (202) 616-4119 / Fax: (202) 305-0506 Email: tyler.burgess@usdoj.gov ANDREA GELATT Wildlife & Marine Resources Section PO Box 7611 Washington, DC 20044-7611 Tel: (202) 305-0210 / Fax: (202) 305-0275 Email: andrea.gelatt@usdoj.gov Attorneys for Federal Defendants 11 12 The Court having considered the Stipulation of the parties, IT IS SO ORDERED 13 14 15 Dated: 5/24/2016 /s/ John A. Mendez____________ Hon. John A. Mendez United States District Court Judge 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Conservation Congress v. United States Forest Service, et al., No. 2:13-cv-01977-JAM-KJN STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE – Page 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?