Estrada et al v. iYogi, Inc.
Filing
73
STIPULATION and ORDER 72 signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 8/17/2015 extending time for plaintiffs to file their motion for preliminary approval of the parties' proposed class action settlement by 8/21/2015. (Kirksey Smith, K)
1 Samuel Lasser (SBN – 252754)
slasser@edelson.com
2 EDELSON PC
1934 Divisadero Street
3 San Francisco, California 94115
Tel: 415.212.9300
4 Fax: 415.373.9435
5 Jay Edelson (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
jedelson@edelson.com
6 Rafey Balabanian (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
rbalabanian@edelson.com
7 Benjamin H. Richman (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
brichman@edelson.com
8 Courtney C. Booth (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
cbooth@edelson.com
9 EDELSON PC
350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300
10 Chicago, Illinois 60654
Tel: 312.589.6370
11 Fax: 312.589.6378
12 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Putative Class
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
15
VICKI ESTRADA, PATRICIA GOODMAN
16 and KIM WILLIAMS-BRITT individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
17
Plaintiffs,
18
v.
19 IYOGI, INC., a New York corporation,
20
Case No. 2:13-cv-01989-WBS-CKD
ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE TO
FILE MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY
APPROVAL
Judge William B. Shubb
Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney
Defendant.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01989-WBS-CKD
This matter coming before the Court on the Parties’ Stipulation to Extend Deadline to File
1
2 Motion for Preliminary Approval, due and adequate notice having been given, and the Court being
3 duly advised on the premises,
4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that plaintiffs shall file their motion for
5 preliminary approval of the parties’ proposed class action settlement no later than August 21,
6 2015.
7 Dated: August 17, 2015
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
CASE NO. 2:13-CV-01989-WBS-CKD
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?