Daoust et al v. ATG-Rehab Specialists, Inc.
Filing
29
ORDER signed by Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr on 3/3/14 ADOPTING IN FULL 28 Findings and Recommendations; GRANTING 20 Motion to Remand. This action is REMANDED to Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin. Copy of remand order sent to other court. CASE CLOSED. (Meuleman, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
VIVIAN DAOUST,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-1997 GEB CKD PS
v.
ORDER
ATG-REHAB SPECIALISTS, INC., et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiffs filed the above-entitled action. The matter was referred to a United States
17
18
Magistrate Judge pursuant to Local Rule 302(c).
On January 16, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
19
20
which were served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that any objections to
21
the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections to the
22
findings and recommendations have been filed.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
23
24
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
25
ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed January 16, 2014 are adopted in full;
26
27
/////
28
/////
1
1
2. Plaintiff’s motion to remand (ECF No. 20) is granted; and
2
3. This action is remanded to the Superior Court of California, County of San Joaquin.
3
Dated: March 3, 2014
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?