King v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation et al
Filing
14
ORDER signed by Chief Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 3/17/2014 ADOPTING the 12 findings and recommendations in full; this action is DISMISSED as to all defendants except C. Ferguson, R. W. Cappel and L. Williams; and the Clerk shall revise the docket of this action to so reflect.(Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ALFRED KING,
12
13
14
15
No. 2:13-cv-2010 MCE CKD P
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION,
et al.,
16
Defendants.
17
18
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
19
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to
20
28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
21
On February 18, 2014, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein
22
which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the
23
findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff has not filed
24
objections to the findings and recommendations.
25
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be
26
supported by the record and by the magistrate judge’s analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY
27
ORDERED that:
28
1. The findings and recommendations filed February 18, 2014 are adopted in full;
1
1
2
3
2. This action is dismissed as to all defendants except C. Ferguson, R.W. Cappel, and L.
Williams; and
3. The Clerk of Court shall revise the docket of this action to so reflect.
4
5
Dated: March 17, 2014
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?