Cofield v. Maydole et al
Filing
39
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/21/16 ORDERING that the Clerk of Court is directed to reopen this case; Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (ECF No. 35 ) is GRANTED; and Plaintiff shall file objections within twenty-one days from the date of this Order. (Becknal, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
VINCENT E. COFIELD,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-2032 TLN DB P
v.
ORDER
MAYDOLE, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief
17
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 14, 2016, the then-assigned magistrate judge filed findings
18
and recommendations recommending that Defendants’ April 27, 2015, motion for summary
19
judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies be granted. When Plaintiff failed to file
20
timely objections, the findings and recommendations were adopted in full and this action was
21
dismissed. Judgment was entered accordingly. Following the entry of judgment, Plaintiff filed a
22
motion for extension of time to file his objections. On review, Plaintiff’s motion will be granted.
23
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
24
1. The Clerk of Court is directed to reopen this case;
25
2. Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time (ECF No. 35) is GRANTED; and
26
///
27
///
28
1
1
3. Plaintiff shall file objections within twenty-one days from the date of this Order.
2
3
Dated: October 21, 2016
4
5
Troy L. Nunley
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?