Cofield v. Maydole et al

Filing 39

ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 10/21/16 ORDERING that the Clerk of Court is directed to reopen this case; Plaintiff's motion for extension of time (ECF No. 35 ) is GRANTED; and Plaintiff shall file objections within twenty-one days from the date of this Order. (Becknal, R)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 VINCENT E. COFIELD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-2032 TLN DB P v. ORDER MAYDOLE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 17 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 14, 2016, the then-assigned magistrate judge filed findings 18 and recommendations recommending that Defendants’ April 27, 2015, motion for summary 19 judgment for failure to exhaust administrative remedies be granted. When Plaintiff failed to file 20 timely objections, the findings and recommendations were adopted in full and this action was 21 dismissed. Judgment was entered accordingly. Following the entry of judgment, Plaintiff filed a 22 motion for extension of time to file his objections. On review, Plaintiff’s motion will be granted. 23 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 24 1. The Clerk of Court is directed to reopen this case; 25 2. Plaintiff’s motion for extension of time (ECF No. 35) is GRANTED; and 26 /// 27 /// 28 1 1 3. Plaintiff shall file objections within twenty-one days from the date of this Order. 2 3 Dated: October 21, 2016 4 5 Troy L. Nunley United States District Judge 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?