Kennedy v. Chappell

Filing 52

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/13/2015 ORDERING that the parties agree the following claims in the petition filed here on 1/15/2015, are unexhausted and this court finds they are: Claim VI, subclaim (a); Claim VI, subclaim (b)(2); Claim VII, subclaim (a); Claim VII, subclaim (b)(1); Claim XI, subclaim (a); Claim XII; and Claim XIII. Within 45 days, petitioner shall file any motion for stay and abeyance of these proceedings pending exhaustion. Within 30 days of petitioner's filing, respondent shall file a response. Within 15 days thereafter, petitioner may file a reply.(Yin, K)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JERRY NOBLE KENNEDY, 12 Petitioner, 13 14 No. 2:13-cv-02041 KJM KJN DP DEATH PENALTY CASE v. WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison, 15 ORDER Respondent. 16 17 Pursuant to the court’s February 13, 2015 order, the parties filed a joint statement 18 explaining the exhaustion status of the claims in the petition and proposing a briefing schedule for 19 petitioner’s motion to stay/abey these proceedings pending exhaustion. Good cause appearing, IT 20 IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 21 1. The parties agree the following claims in the petition filed here on January 12, 2015, 22 are unexhausted and this court finds they are: Claim VI, subclaim (a); Claim VI, 23 subclaim (b)(2); Claim VII, subclaim (a); Claim VII, subclaim (b)(1); Claim XI, 24 subclaim (a); Claim XII; and Claim XIII. 2. Within 45 days of the filed date of this order, petitioner shall file any motion for stay 25 and abeyance of these proceedings pending exhaustion. Within 30 days of petitioner’s 26 27 ///// 28 ///// 1 1 filing, respondent shall file a response. Within 15 days thereafter, petitioner may file a 2 reply. 3 Dated: May 13, 2015 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Kennedy exh id.or 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?