Kennedy v. Chappell
Filing
57
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/9/2015 ORDERING the Office of the Federal Defender, Capital Habeas Unit, shall represent petitioner as co-counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3599. A status conference is set for 10/8/2015 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. The Clerk shall file UNDER SEAL the Selection Board's 9/8/2015 letter to the undersigned. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this order on Kurt Heiser, CJA Administrator. (cc: Kurt Heiser) (Yin, K)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JERRY NOBLE KENNEDY,
12
Petitioner,
13
14
No. 2:13-cv-02041 KJM KJN DP
DEATH PENALTY CASE
v.
WARDEN, San Quentin State Prison,
15
ORDER
Respondent.
16
The Selection Board has recommended the appointment of the Office of the
17
18
Federal Defender as co-counsel to represent petitioner in this habeas corpus proceeding. Good
19
cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:
1. The Office of the Federal Defender, Capital Habeas Unit, shall represent petitioner as
20
co-counsel pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3599. See Local Rule 191(c).
21
2. On October 8, 2015, at 10:00 a.m., the undersigned will hold a status conference. The
22
23
court expects petitioner’s newly appointed attorney to be prepared to discuss the
24
identification of the unexhausted claims and all attorneys to be prepared to discuss
25
petitioner’s motion to stay these proceedings pending exhaustion.
3. The Clerk of the Court is directed to file under seal the Selection Board’s September
26
8, 2015 letter to the undersigned.
27
28
////
1
1
2
3
4. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this order on Kurt Heiser, CJA
Administrator, Office of the Federal Defender.
Dated: September 9, 2015
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Kennedy FD appmt.or
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?