Dearwester v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department et al

Filing 12

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 4/25/2014 DISMISSING this action, with prejudice. CASE CLOSED.(Yin, K)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

FRANK LEE DEARWESTER,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14
15

No. 2:13-cv-2062 AC P

v.

ORDER

SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S
DEPARTMENT, et al.,
Defendants.

16
17

Plaintiff filed this action pro se while a Sacramento County jail inmate,1 pursuant to 42

18
19

U.S.C. § 1983. By a filing dated October 30, 2013, plaintiff consented to the jurisdiction of the

20

undersigned. By order filed March 11, 2014, the court granted plaintiff twenty-eight days to file

21

an amended complaint. In the March 11th order, the court informed plaintiff of the deficiencies

22

in his complaint. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to file an amended complaint would result in

23

dismissal of this action. The twenty-eight day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed

24

an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order.

25

////

26

////

27
28

1

Plaintiff has since been incarcerated as a state prisoner. Court records indicate he was served
with the March 11, 2014 order at his most recent address.

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice.

2

See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).

3

DATED: April 25, 2014

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2