Dearwester v. Sacramento County Sheriff's Department

Filing 89

ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 09/07/17 DENYING 88 Motion for Certificate of Appealability. (Plummer, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 FRANK LEE DEARWESTER, 12 13 14 15 16 No. 2:13-cv-2064 MCE DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT, Defendant. 17 18 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights 19 action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges defendant’s establishment of a postcard-only 20 mail policy violated his First Amendment rights. Plaintiff filed a document on August 28, 2017 21 entitled “Motion for Certificate of Appealability of 08/09/17 Order.” (ECF No. 88.) The August 22 9 order affirmed the undersigned’s denial of plaintiff’s motion for the appointment of counsel. 23 (ECF Nos. 87, 80.) 24 Plaintiff is advised that a certificate of appealability is only necessary in a habeas corpus 25 proceeding. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253. In this civil rights action, plaintiff need not seek permission 26 from this court to appeal. That said, plaintiff is further advised that the Court of Appeals does not 27 have jurisdiction to consider the appeals of orders that are not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 28 § 1291; WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc). The Ninth 1 1 Circuit has held that the district court’s denial of a motion for the appointment of counsel in a 2 civil rights case is not a final or appealable order under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. See Kuster v. Block, 3 773 F.2d 1048, 1049 (9th Cir. 1985); see also Akmal v. Centerstance Inc., 503 F. App’x 538 (9th 4 Cir. 2013); Burnett v. Faecher, 361 F. App’x 900 (9th Cir. 2010). 5 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that plaintiff’s motion for a certificate of 6 appealability (ECF No. 88) is denied. 7 Dated: September 7, 2017 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 DLB:9 DLB1/prisoner-civil rights/dear2064.deny coa 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?